With only 72 days before reading 2003 , i really do think its time u actually post your review of the 2002 festival, surely it does not take the better half of a year to write a review. Thank god ur not a writer for a living, you wouldnt make a lot of money mate. Please have it done for us ASAP man, cus other than that your site has to be the best one for reading,no faults at all other than that one

P.S Mad Caddies YEEEAAAHHH!! :)

...it's a funny thing, but if you visit the Downloads page, you'll find a Reading 2002 desktop, which means that I've found the CD of pics. Even better than that, last night I sized up the pics for the 2002 review. I've even written some words, too, so it's kind of happening. However, I have no excuses for my tardiness. I am a worthless dog. But stick with it - it might actually be worth seeing. i've just got to try and remember everything that happened, otherwise, the review will read something like this:

Pitched tent, got pissed, saw a few bands, went home.

Still, the pics are fun.

Fat Reg

Yes Reg, you do that in every review, but for some reason your reviews on the festival are by far the best. I'm still looking foward to the 2002 review though, Iv'e read them all. They get you in the mood for Reading alirght.

... If i put it on here people would complain about the megalong post!! If you want it on your site, I could post one to you Reg, if you like(no pics unfortunately).

its because it from the perspective of a festival goer and not phil alexander in the backstage bar offering bands blowjobs for interviews. oh and the writing style is top too