Home > Discussion Groups > Dioramas

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4. From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=78970&messageid=1113823195
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

 Return to Index  

sorry to be rude but war of the rats was just terrible

August 26 2001 at 7:16 PM
  (no login)
from IP address 206.127.225.135


Response to THINK ABOUT IT LOGICALLY...

war of the rats was so historically inaccurate that I could not even finish it. the writer knew nothing about weapons, tanks, bullets or the battle. the love story was just awful. the diologe was awful, chessy crap. the writer, violating a cardinal rule of historical writing, took such obvious relish in writing about germans being killed that the book read like something written by a russian during the war. the germans came off as stupid or evil or both. the russians came off as heroic and brave. Im no nazi and Im glad they lost the war but I do know that they were some of the most effective soldiers to ever fight a war. to make them out as stupid is just childish and offensive to people's intellegence. and even though the germans were the bad guys, the russians were not much better.

dave swann

 
 Respond to this message   


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse