Home > Discussion Groups > Dioramas

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4. From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=78970&messageid=1113823195
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Aircraft Modellers

November 10 2003 at 12:08 PM
  (Login bbrowniii)
from IP address 164.107.25.137

This might at first seem an inappropriate topic for this forum, but bear with me...

I am currently working on a 1/48th scale diorama involving a F4U-1D corsair of VMF-232 at Okinawa. The plane has returned from a mission shot up, sliding off the runway into to grass of Kadena airfield. A groundcrewman is supporting the wounded pilot as a jeep pulls up to transport him to the medical tent.

As I have been working on this project it occured to me how differently armor and aircraft modelers approach our kits. As part of my research, I searched high and low for aircraft that are built with damage. There are very few of them out there. By comparison, armor modelers (of which I am one, just taking a little break), LOVE to display our stuff with dirt and grime and damage.

In the grand scheme of things, this matters very little, but I thought it was an interesting observation. When we build aircraft, we seem to try to make them as pretty as possible; when we build armor, we try to put them is an natural a setting as possible.

What do you guys think? Am I looking in the wrong places or does there seem to be a distinct difference in the goals of aircraft versus armor modelers?

Boyd

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(no login)
62.238.7.83

Re: Aircraft Modellers

November 11 2003, 3:28 AM 

It always seems to me like the mentality in the two "groups" is very different, in exactly the way you observed: armor modellers want models looking as if they were the real thing under real conditions, aircraft modellers want models looking like they're in a dealer's showroom. (I'm generalizing, of course.)

As for damage to aircraft models, one of the old Verlinden Way books (the one about aircraft) has a chapter one how to do this. As I recall, it was a pretty good treatment of the subject.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
217.35.101.197

Shep Paine's book

November 12 2003, 6:15 AM 

He did one for Kalmbach about making dioramas which had several damaged aircraft in it, including one of the B24 'Lady be Good'. I think it was called 'Modelling Military Dioramas' or similar.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
80.201.1.216

I don't necessarily agree

November 13 2003, 2:35 AM 

I'm just like you, but the other way around
I mostly do airplane models and I build AFVs only to take a break from wings and bombs.

There are a lot of guys who like their aircraft as dirty as possible but the problem is these darn crew chiefs that love their aircraft so much that they take good care of them (these guys are terrific)

So I would nuance a little the difference, IMHO, an AFV is very easily seen dirty because it evolves in a dirty environment. The air is clean and most of the time, the aircraft stays clean too - altough navy aircraft becomes dirty quite easily.

Still we weather our airplane models with the same techniques most of you guys are using: heavily diluted paint in the panel lines, drybrush, pastels, colour pigments, you name it. The techniques are quite often the same but more nuanced on the airplanes due to realism contraints.

Here are some pix of models I did in both categories:

Revell 1/32 tornado

Tamiya 1/48 skyraider

tamiya Tiger diorama 1/35

My current unfinished project

Happy modelling - whatever you model
Olivier

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
24.231.9.147

Nice Fin!

November 13 2003, 2:21 PM 

Oliver, the tornado is terrific. I love the reverse thrust staining on the tail and the chipped paint! Is that the paragon flap/slat set? How did you like it?

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
80.201.9.147

thanks

November 14 2003, 1:48 AM 

Yes, it's been built with the paragon flaps and slats set as well as a cockpit update.

Lots of work to drop the flaps on the revell tornado but it's well worth it. The quality of the set is really good and the instruction are clear.

The good thing is that since the flaps are dropped, the wing can't swept back and we can glue them inside the fuselage. Because if it's not done, the wings will drop too much spoiling the model.

Sorry for the OT guys

Olivier

 
 Respond to this message   
Boyd Brown
(Login bbrowniii)
164.107.25.137

Re: I don't necessarily agree

November 17 2003, 11:53 AM 

Oliver,

WOW! Very nice work in both "dimensions" of our hobby. I particularly like the frosted effect you have on your Panther dio.

I would have to agree with you about the whole crew chief thing. Curse those groundcrews!! Paricularly with modern jets and helos.

Hey, man, keep up the good work and don't hesitate to post more photos. Your stuff is quite impressive.

Boyd

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login bbrowniii)
164.107.25.137

Re: Re: I don't necessarily agree

November 17 2003, 11:55 AM 

Ooops, I mean Tiger diorama.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
65.140.123.226

The Skyraider...WOW!!!

November 20 2003, 3:28 PM 

Oliver, As I was scrolling down to see that photo,I honestly thought I was looking at a pic of the real thing! Congrats on the modeling AND on the photography!!

 
 Respond to this message   
Ricardo Rueda
(no login)
200.106.171.178

Beat up aircraft

December 5 2003, 3:32 PM 

There's a really good book called "Forsaken Deserted Aeroplanes". The following models are inspired in that book.

The model:


The real thing:


Hope you like it,

Ricardo

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Aircraft Modellers
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse