Actually,,,think we should ask for better than this....February 9 2018 at 7:03 PM
|gubb33ps (Login gubb33ps)|
Response to Springers will always be made ...
"We" being folks that still shoot springers...and "better than this" being the unbalanced nature of most inexpensive springers. Rought/jumpy, really hold sensitive at best (impossibly in accurate at worst).
Yeah...I understand that "power sells"....which is why so many cheap-springers quote velocity on the box that either was achieved by some super-lite pellet or a single reading from a freak shot (OR...just made up).
Going to have to make a better cheap springer if we are to "hook" the new guys into the system....there are very nice shooting $200-$300 PCPs...ignore the energy difference...but if springers are going to "keep up" they are going to have to find a way to be easier for the average first time buyer to shoot well (average first time buyer isn't going to spend the $$$ for the best ones we have now).
|This message has been edited by gubb33ps on Feb 9, 2018 7:06 PM|