<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

September 11 'mastermind confesses'

March 15 2007 at 2:38 PM
No score for this post

'Tommy'  (Login Tommy_01)
Forum Owner

 
September 11 'mastermind confesses'
By Sally Peck and agencies
Last Updated: 12:07pm GMT 15/03/2007


The alleged mastermind of the September 11 attacks has confessed to his role in those and other al-Qa'eda attacks, according to an edited transcript of a hearing at Guantanamo Bay released by the Pentagon late last night.


Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

"I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z," Khalid Sheikh Mohammed said in a statement.

"I was the operational director for Sheikh Osama bin Laden for the organising, planning, follow-up, and execution of the 9/11 operation," he said.

Mohammed, who was arrested in Rawalpindi in 2003, also allegedly acknowledged responsibility for over 30 other terror attacks or plots, including plans to bomb other landmarks in the US and the UK, including Big Ben and Heathrow airport.

Mohammed said in the statement, read for him during a closed-door military hearing at the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that the attacks were part of a larger military campaign. He also indicated that earlier statements he had made to the CIA were the result of torture, but said his confession on Saturday was not made under duress.

The presiding colonel said Mohammed's allegations of torture would be "reported for any investigation that may be appropriate" and would be taken into account in considering his enemy combatant status.

Hearings are being held into 14 of the most "high-value" suspects held in Cuba. Mohammed is considered the most important of the 14, who were moved to Guantanamo Bay last year from secret CIA detention facilities overseas.

Mohammed, a Pakistani national, claimed responsibility for dozens of the worst terror plots attempted or carried out in the last 15 years, including the 2002 bombing of a nightclub in Bali, Indonesia.

In a section of the statement that was blacked out, he confessed to the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, according to the Associated Press. Pearl was abducted in January 2002 in Pakistan while researching a story on Islamic militancy and Mohammed has long been a suspect in the killing.

The transcript also makes clear that al-Qa'eda wanted to down a trans-Atlantic aircraft during would-be shoe bomber Richard Reid's operation.

The September 11 terror attacks killed 2,972 people, destroyed the World Trade Centre and damaged the Pentagon. Speaking through a translator, Mohammed said he was "not happy" about the victims, saying he did not like to kill people, but justified his actions as part of a holy war against the United States.

The Pentagon released the redacted transcripts of the hearing along with those of two other captured suspected al-Qa'eda operatives - Abu Faraj al-Libi and Ramzi bin Al-Shibh. The hearings, which began on Friday, are to determine whether each detainee can be deemed an "enemy combatant." Such a designation would clear the way for a criminal trial in a US military tribunal under the new military commissions law signed by President George W Bush in October.

Around 385 men are being held in the Guantanamo Bay base on suspicion of links to al-Qa'eda or the Taliban. Legal experts and journalists have criticized the US decision to bar independent observers from the hearings.


Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: profile
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/15/wqaeda215.xml

Mohammed's statement in full
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/transcript_ISN10024.pdf

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Jim
(no login)

Re: September 11 'mastermind confesses'

No score for this post
March 15 2007, 7:36 PM 

KSM is confessing to everything and anything,some he was involved in some he was not.
He is using his position to cause confusion and doubt in other possible intel they have.
You use some basis of truth mixed with falsities and this creates probability of action.
Hey but it sounds good in the press that he confesses to so much terror ,lol.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Jack
(no login)

Re: September 11 'mastermind confesses'

No score for this post
March 15 2007, 8:57 PM 

Yeah, it's been said of this bloke before that he's a bit of a braggart and would like to see himself cast as a terrorist mastermind for our times. As Jim says there's probbably a smattering of hyperbole there.

Jack

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Acorn
(no login)

Re: September 11 'mastermind confesses'

No score for this post
March 15 2007, 9:56 PM 

Did he confess to recruiting Guido Fawkes for the Gunpowder Plot while he was at it?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

'Tommy'
(Login Tommy_01)
Forum Owner

Re: September 11 'mastermind confesses'

No score for this post
March 16 2007, 11:06 AM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

'Tommy'
(Login Tommy_01)
Forum Owner

Re: September 11 'mastermind confesses'

No score for this post
March 18 2007, 4:56 PM 

Terrorist's confession exposes dark side of US

By Niall Ferguson, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 12:01am GMT 18/03/2007

The historian lives for the revelatory document. He spends long days in the libraries and the archives, turning pages, poring over routine correspondence, in the hope of striking golden words - a single magical page that, as he turns it, unveils the elusive past. I have found at least one such document for every book I have written. And I still remember each one with almost photographic clarity.

The account book that showed just how much the Rothschilds had lent the Austrian chancellor Prince Metternich. The diary of the ordinary Tommy who had quite enjoyed killing Germans on the Western Front. The letter that revealed that John Maynard Keynes had been in love with one of the German delegates to the Versailles conference. The explicit order to direct the efforts of Bomber Command at German civilians. Each one provided a flash of illumination, confirming or refuting an earlier hypothesis. My pulse quickened as I read and reread them.

I had something of that same excitement as I read the Verbatim Transcript of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Hearing for ISN 10024, otherwise known as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the al-Qaeda leader captured in Pakistan in 2003. For this document, released by the Pentagon last week, tells us more about the true nature of the war on terror than any other single document I have read. In particular, it shows us how the combatants in this war are in subtle ways growing alike.

"There's an osmosis in war," declares the fascistically inclined American general in Norman Mailer's Second World War novel The Naked and the Dead, "Call it what you will, but the victors always tend to assume the... the, eh, trappings of the loser."

"As kinetic energy," he explains to Mailer's doomed hero, "a country is organisation, co-ordinated effort... fascism... The purpose of this war is to translate America's potential into kinetic energy... America is going to absorb that dream, it's in the -business of doing that now." It was precisely that fascist contamination which after the war produced McCarthyism and reinvigorated racism in the South.

Now we can see the process of contamination at work again - though in this case, intriguingly, it is a process of mutual contamination.

What is obviously sensational about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's statement before the tribunal is the sheer scale of the terrorist campaign he claims to have masterminded.

As Osama bin Laden's "Military Operational Commander", he was responsible not only for "the organising, planning, follow-up and execution... from A to Z" of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, but also for the 1993 attempt to blow up the World Trade Centre, the murder of the American journalist Daniel Pearl, the attempt by the shoe bomber Richard Reid to blow up a plane, the murder of two US soldiers in Kuwait, and other bombings in Bali, Mombassa and Turkey.

Moreover, his confession to the tribunal alluded to more than 20 terrorist crimes which he planned but did not succeed in carrying out, including "Dirty Bomb Operations on American soil", post-9/11 "Second Wave" attacks on the Library Tower in Los Angeles, the Sears Tower in Chicago, the Plaza Bank in Washington state and the Empire State Building in New York, and further attacks on New York's suspension bridges and stock exchange; on American nuclear power plants; on Heathrow airport, Canary Wharf and Big Ben; on the Straits of Hormuz and Gibraltar, on Singapore and the Panama Canal; on Nato's headquarters in Brussels; on three American embassies; on Israel itself and four Israeli embassies; and on Western targets in Thailand and South Korea.

As if that were not enough, Mohammed informed the tribunal that he was responsible for planning the assassinations of former Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, Pope John Paul II and the Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf.

Oh, and he also intended to destroy "an American oil company owned by the Jewish former Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, on the Island of Sumatra".

So breathtaking and, in certain respects, bizarre is the list of alleged targets that it is tempting to wonder if the prisoner was in fact making mock of his military audience. Yet the al-Qaeda attacks that were actually carried out were scarcely less breathtaking and bizarre.

If even a quarter of these other atrocities have been prevented by this man's detention and other measures taken by the Bush administration, this President deserves eternal fame, not the opprobrium that is currently being heaped upon him.

Yet the transcript also sheds light on the dark underbelly of Mr Bush's presidency. "Did you make these statements because of the treatment you received from these... interrogators?" the "detainee" is asked by the president of the tribunal.

"You are not under any pressure or duress today," he later asks, "is that correct?"

"I know American people are torturing us from Seventies," Mohammed later declares. "I know they talking about human rights. And I know it is against American Constitution, against American laws." These words remind us that there is something rotten at the heart of this system of military justice.

Not only does the court president implicitly acknowledge that the prisoner before him has been tortured in the past. He also makes it clear that the prisoner is being denied proper legal representation; he has only a US Air Force lieutenant-colonel to act as his "personal representative".

Everyone in the courtroom except the prisoner and the translator is an American military officer. Mohammed's request for two fellow prisoners to be summoned as witnesses is denied. He is informed at the end of the hearing that he will almost certainly remain in captivity for an indefinite period.

And quite right too, you may well say, given the monstrous nature of the crimes and intended crimes to which he has confessed, and given his readiness to acknowledge that he is an enemy combatant at war with the United States - a "jackal fighting in the nights", in his own striking phrase.

But does it really honour the memory of Daniel Pearl to torture his murderer? And what of the other prisoners who, according to Mohammed, are being erroneously held in the same judicial limbo-land as himself: Afghans and Pakistanis who had nothing whatever to do with al-Qaeda?

Here we see Mailer's law of the osmosis of war at work: the indiscriminate terrorists who perpetrated 9/11 have elicited from the United States an equally indiscriminate response. The guilty and the innocent are thrown into military prisons. Military retaliation too has been indiscriminate, not least in Iraq.

There is, nevertheless, a twist in the tale. For the transcript also shows that the osmosis of this war is a reciprocal process.

Consider what it reveals about al-Qaeda as an organization. It relied heavily on computers in preparing the 9/11 attacks. It has learned from Western warfare the importance of economic targets. It regards the manipulation of the media as an integral part of its terrorist mission. Its leaders speak English.

And - most fascinating of all - its Military Operational Commander claims the greatest of the Founding Fathers as his role model. I quote: "If now we were living in the Revolutionary War and George Washington he being arrested through Britain. For sure... they would consider him enemy combatant."

You can imagine the assembled soldiery rolling their eyes heavenwards. An Islamist Washington fighting for liberty against American redcoats? What could be more preposterous? Except that this reveals another characteristic of the osmosis of war. Pace Mailer, it is far from obvious to the two sides in this war that they are growing subtly alike.

Only in retrospect, as the historian leafs through this and the other documents that survive "redaction" and classification, will it become apparent to Americans how the war on terror turned a part of them into their enemy - and a part of their enemy into themselves.
# Niall Ferguson is Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History at Harvard University
www.niallferguson.org
© Niall Ferguson, 2007


    
This message has been edited by Tommy_01 on Mar 18, 2007 5:07 PM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - September 11 'mastermind confesses'
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on Military, Law Enforcement and Emergency ServicesCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Search    Chat!    Post A Message    Free Counters