Click here for Host attention.

 

 Return to Index  

That's right. So your Benedict is not a valid bishop.

July 4 2009 at 2:05 AM		Tomas  (Login TomasSedlacek)


Response to Following the logic of your argument, the bishop must have a wife and children too.
Your argument about Paul is not valid. Apostle Paul was not a bishop. But Peter had a wife, and since he was a bishop, he must have had at least 2 children.

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Where does it say that Peter had at least two children? - Beatrice77 on Jul 4, 2:20 PM
    1. It is proven by the fact that he became a bishop. - Tomas on Jul 9, 3:52 PM
     
  2. St. James was bishop of Jerusalem. How many children did he have? - Beatrice77 on Jul 4, 2:40 PM
    3.  
  3. St. James was bishop of Jerusalem. How many children did he have? - Beatrice77 on Jul 4, 2:40 PM
    1. At least 2. - Tomas on Jul 9, 4:03 PM
     
  4. Bishop must have children to be qualified? If his wife is infertile, - Beatrice77 on Jul 5, 6:16 AM
    1. If she is infertile, then he cannot become a bishop, - Tomas on Jul 9, 4:10 PM
     
  5. So even Jesus cannot qualify as bishop for he was not married and had no children. - Beatrice77 on Jul 7, 3:50 PM
    1. Jesus had titles much superior to bishop. - Tomas on Jul 9, 4:18 PM
     
  6. For that matter even Paul and unmarried apostles like John could not qualify - Beatrice77 on Jul 7, 3:58 PM
    1. That's right, Paul was not a bishop. - Tomas on Jul 9, 4:25 PM
     
Find more forums on ChristianityCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

Click here for Host attention.