1. Did she face a public press conference where she admitted to lying to besmirch the reputation of the "angel?"
No. She didnt need to. She was not after publicity
2. Did she receive bribe money for the "retraction."
There was no evidence to prove she did.
3. What kind of benefits did she receive from Felix Manalo?
She was accepted back to the true church.
4. Was she not made a deaconess after she signed the "retraction?"
Maybe, after proving her worth.
5. If she was a liar, why would the "angel" make a liar who besmirched his reputation a deaconess?
She made a mistake. She confessed her sin and asked forgiveness. She already told the truth.
6. Did the "angel" adopt her son? Who was the father of her son? Why would the "angel" adopt her son when he already have many children with his wife?
There's no law the prohibit somebody to adopt someone's child. Whether it was adoption or whatever, you also do not know. Everything is just left your imagination.
7. Did she not stay at the Central? Why was she permitted to stay at the Central if she lied and besmirched the reputation of the "angel?"
Same answer as question no. 5
8. The alleged "retraction" raises many questions. Can you truthfully answer them?
There's no reason to doubt it, unless you are privy to her when she made the retraction.
|