I do not question the methodology. I doubt his results.
At least until I can see his sampling and control methods. This is ESPECIALLY true before I can believe wild claims that go contrary to logic(the 3 things I cited earlier).
The man is no more educated than I am, but he IS more educated in the vet field. I will continue to doubt some of his findings until I can check his methods.
Alternately if anyone can explain how those 3 things can go against common logic, I will accept that reasoning too. I really want the truth and try very hard to stay openminded(yes, this is the same Keith from Denali's BB) about this, but wont blindly accept some1's claims without proof. And yes it frustrates me when this guy is cited on the www as an expert by those who havent read anything but his summary.
(i am very much NOT talking about you, Colleen!!!)
