Still?

James: You still embelish the answer with a mmyriad of things that have no connection to a direct answer to the question that I have asked. I did not seek for enhanced thoughts as to what was stated by Bro. Johnson. I did not seek interpretation as to what his intent was when he posted his article. I sought a simple YES or NO based upon the presentation given by Bro. Johnson. I find it incredible that you are unable to look at my question, examine the referenced publication by Bro. Johnson and then draw a YES or NO conclusion. Stonewalling to evade the answer brings no solution. James, I wish you no ill, however this is our last communication as it is obvious that if I cannot get a straight answer for such a simple question, than answers that you give to any future topics would be quite questionable. I have better things to do on the Lord's behalf than to entertain running around in circles. If in the future you must contact me, you may do so as Tirzah via e-mail as you have so done in the past. Again, I wish you well.

Harold