<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012 at 4:48 PM

Em  (Login crackedemerald)
BW Member
from IP address 99.116.250.157

From today's New York Daily News:

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/new-book-takes-mick-jagger-affair-david-bowie-article-1.1109887

The usual, with pictures.

"With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil, that takes religion." Steven Weinberg

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

BB1
(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.106.64

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012, 7:05 PM 

True? not true? either way in 2012 are we supposed to be shocked?

Oh yeah! It's the 40th anniversary of Ziggy, so it's an excuse for yet someone else to bring out a Bowie book only this time it has to be quite shocking? in order to compete with all the others.

Yaaaaaaaaaawn!

--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------









    
This message has been edited by trevorhalvo from IP address 92.0.106.64 on Jul 12, 2012 8:16 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012, 7:38 PM 

What trev said.

____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

Claude
(Login Claude2011)
BW Member
94.36.252.228

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012, 7:57 PM 

After 40 years we are still talking about that lovers couple?
I can only imagine the sexual sparks between the two stars. wink.gif

-------------
*Claude*
-------------

 
 Respond to this message   
Paul Trynka
(Login Pablo-T)
BW Member
86.1.102.121

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012, 8:11 PM 

Well, when I saw the extracts printed in the Daily News etc I thought it was a load of old tosh.

I thought Bebe Buell's quote seemed off, having spoken to her. And I thought Ava Cherry's quote seemed off, having spoken to her. And we all know how Angie didn't mention seeing Mick and David in bed together in her first book... and put it in the second, along with lots of other stories to, er, attract attention.

I emailed Bebe:

"NO I did not [say that] - he is a liar!! I NEVER said that as I NEVER witnessed that and I'm very upset as to how to fix it! I am very pissed off at him."

I emailed Ava:

" That story is definitely a lie!!!"

It's depressing, but not surprising, that newspapers feel compelled to print loads of old shite like this. There are much better scurrilous stories to be told than this old, baseless gossip. I wouldn't mind reading a decent Jagger book, but this ain't one of them. The guy obviously knows nothing about him.

IF David Bowie and Mick Jagger had sex, one of them would have to be on the bottom. And anyone who knows anything at all about the two of them knows that ain't gonna happen.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login lillybrinker)
24.91.164.239

Olympic Sport

July 12 2012, 9:46 PM 

The two of them may as well do the act on stage for the opening act of the Olympics.

 
 Respond to this message   
andy
(Login andyrushworth)
BW Member
82.2.141.90

Re: Olympic Sport

July 12 2012, 10:23 PM 

This is boring old news ,footballers kiss and cuddle so Rock stars have to go further ,it was their job to be outrageous during the seventies !

 
 Respond to this message   

Dunce
(Login DuncanNorvelle)
65.183.151.13

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012, 10:59 PM 



You always feel the sting of words
As children are so cruel
They called you ugly, ugly head
When you were at school

-----------------------------------------------
Bisous.

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Mist001)
BW Member
85.68.34.9

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012, 11:17 PM 

Thing is, it's the 5000th anniversary of the Stones and they're playing a few shows, eventually headlining Jurrasic Park. It's been their custom for the past 600 tours that to get pre-tour publicity, stories like this always do the rounds. Remember the Bill Wyman and that Mandy Smith? Same thing. A wee bit of controversy for publicity purposes, that's all.

Mist.

"Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, simply surrounded by assholes." - William Gibson.

 
 Respond to this message   

ulysse
(Login ulysse99)
92.133.4.235

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 12 2012, 11:27 PM 

in publishing this article, NY Daily news contribute to accure bowie legend even if the first goal were to sell in disseminate a showbizz story instead of taking a position about what happen really in the world.


 
 Respond to this message   

Em
(Login crackedemerald)
BW Member
99.116.250.157

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 13 2012, 4:15 PM 

It's interesting that they're using it to flog a Jagger bio.

I think that star-on-star sex was what made peoples' heads spin in the Seventies; we're kind of used to it now.

"With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil, that takes religion." Steven Weinberg

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Sparkina)
BW Member
108.132.57.171

Re: The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)

July 13 2012, 4:57 PM 

If the rumor is true, Lord Lips COULD do worse wink.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

Noel
(Login 2HB)
BW Member
90.200.118.185

people will gossip

July 13 2012, 5:15 PM 

I am suprised that this one is stll attracting press covergae. Oh Paul T. the stuff about top or bottom is
shit. not all gay sex is analy fixated happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Paul Trynka
(Login Pablo-T)
BW Member
86.1.102.121

Re: people will gossip

July 14 2012, 4:35 PM 

Re Top and Bottom, sure, but nonetheless speak to anyone who's seen the two together, they're as much rivals as friends... they never drop their guard with each other, so I can't imagine them dropping their pants.

 
 Respond to this message   

Noel
(Login 2HB)
BW Member
90.200.118.185

Sorry double post

July 13 2012, 5:16 PM 



    
This message has been edited by 2HB from IP address 90.200.118.185 on Jul 13, 2012 5:17 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

Em
(Login crackedemerald)
BW Member
204.128.192.31

Re: Star On Star Sex

July 13 2012, 6:18 PM 

The way I always heard it, the bigger star gets to be on top. So some pop-chart calculation may have been necessary.

"With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil, that takes religion." Steven Weinberg

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login nomadetech)
207.61.145.4

IN Canada also ,

July 13 2012, 7:34 PM 

Canoe.ca had a big story for the idiots.

 
 Respond to this message   

BB1
(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.99.17

Re: IN Canada also ,

July 14 2012, 7:02 AM 

((. Oh Paul T. the stuff about top or bottom is shit. not all gay sex is analy fixated ))

Enlighten us then Noel? wink.gif
 


--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   
hm
(Login hang_man)
BW Member
188.29.22.15

Re: IN Canada also ,

July 14 2012, 8:39 AM 

wanks cock

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.103.220

Re: IN Canada also ,

July 14 2012, 12:39 PM 

What's specifically gay about that hm?

--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   

popp
(Login idnks)
80.60.67.254

Re: IN Canada also ,

July 14 2012, 12:46 PM 

by the way, who cares if they did?
why are people talking about this in 2012?

----------------------------------------
what a beautiful thread, tell the others.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.103.220

Re: IN Canada also ,

July 14 2012, 1:45 PM 

Because someone is trying to flog yet another Bowie book on the back of Ziggys 40th av, only this time they are trying to be controversial about it popp.

--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

Read All About It - Jagger and Bowie? They were sexually obsessed with each other:

July 14 2012, 2:54 PM 

It's all over the fucking Daily Mail now [linked image]

Jagger and Bowie? They were sexually obsessed with each other: Explosive new book says there's another side to the Rolling Stones' love life and that Jagger's conquests include a bandmate and an MP

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2173441/Jagger-Bowie-They-sexually-obsessed-Explosive-new-book-says-theres-Rolling-Stones-love-life-Jaggers-conquests-include-bandmate-MP.html

____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

Re: Read All About It - Jagger and Bowie? They were sexually obsessed with each other:

July 14 2012, 2:57 PM 

Look at this for a readers responce...

I HOPE THAT WAS TRUE...dreaming bowie making love with Jagger.....Oh My God ! what a fabulous dream...
- Hermmione F, France, 14/7/2012 08:13



Could it be her?




____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

ulysse
(Login ulysse99)
109.210.132.154

Re: IN Canada also ,

July 14 2012, 7:05 PM 

why are they speak about it?

to promote a new book of course.

 
 Respond to this message   

Noel
(Login 2HB)
BW Member
90.200.118.185

@BB1

July 14 2012, 7:13 PM 

Well Trev who could resist a blowjob from those lips. You're not interested in his ass. Yes!!! that is personal experience talking. happy.gif (not that I mean Jaggers given me a blowjob ..lol)


    
This message has been edited by 2HB from IP address 90.200.118.185 on Jul 14, 2012 7:15 PM
This message has been edited by 2HB from IP address 90.200.118.185 on Jul 14, 2012 7:15 PM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.103.220

Re: @BB1

July 14 2012, 7:42 PM 

Yeah! but blow jobs, hand jobs, etc are just as specific to us heterosexuals arnt they. I suspect the anal part of it is more specific to a gay relationship than a hetro one even though hetrosexuals engage in the practice as well sometimes, I mean hetrosexuals have another option of where to stick it I suppose is what I'm trying to say.

Assuming anal intercourse is how gays go about things I guess Paul T was meaning someone has to be on top and someone has to be on the bottom unless the two people concerned are standing up when the act is carried out. How else can you do it? I suppose the two people concerned could try doing it by standing on their heads but I should imagine that would be quite uncomfortable and the people concerned would have to posess a certain amount of skill.

Listen I'm not taking the P this has got me wondering? I mean isn't the most common way of doing it for the majority of the time someone on top and someone on the bottom???

I dunno you tell me? happy.gif


--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

I hate stereotyping!!!

July 14 2012, 8:09 PM 

[linked image]

wink.gif

____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.103.220

Re: I hate stereotyping!!!

July 14 2012, 8:28 PM 

I'm not stereotyping Ant or at least I didn't intentionally intend to. Neither did I bring the subject up, Paul T did and then Noel, yourself and whoever carried it on.

Me possessing a naturally inquisitive mind quite naturally found myself wondering what Noel meant? I repeat I'm not taking the proverbial P I really don't know whats what here? ( at least I'm being honest ) since this thread is about Bowie and Jagger getting it on by whoever, and since the acts shall we say we're brought up by others I would. view it as an opportunity to enlighten my and possibly others? ignorance, unless its a taboo subject of course.

--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

Re: I hate stereotyping!!!

July 14 2012, 8:41 PM 

Teasing you a tad trev wink.gif



Perhaps that's why he giggles at the end?

____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.103.220

Re: I hate stereotyping!!!

July 14 2012, 8:48 PM 

LOL! happy.gif

No problem happy.gif I'm sorry if I've caused offence to anyone because I really didn't mean to but how else do you ask questions on such a sensetive subject as this?

As a wise person once told me if you don't ask no one will tell you, the trouble is asking can get you into bother sad.gif

--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   

Noel
(Login 2HB)
BW Member
90.200.118.185

No offence taken

July 14 2012, 9:44 PM 

but your talking (I think) from a male hetro point of view. Believe me we don't feel the need to poke someone. I have had relationships were no anal sex was involved. It's too sore..lol

 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

Re: No offence taken

July 14 2012, 10:24 PM 

LOL! @ Noel

I can understand people being inquisitive.

It's no different to anything else, touchy feely wink.gif

No offence taken trev happy.gif

See you round the back of the bike sheds as planned trev, as always my lips are sealed wink.gif



____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.107.205

Re: No offence taken

July 15 2012, 11:02 AM 

[[but your talking (I think) from a male hetro point of view. Believe me we don't feel the need to poke someone. I have had relationships were no anal sex was involved. It's too sore..lol ]]

LOL!@ Noel wink.gif

Well yes I am talking from a heterosexual point of view which probably does cause me to unintentionally stereotype in the way I asked the question, sad.gif curiosity killed the cat and all that wink.gif I guess it must get annoying. It's like when a lot of straight men think every gay man must automatically fancy getting them in the sack which I know isn't necessarily always the case so I guess I'm not totally ignorant, but I do get both Ant's and your point ( not literally I hasten to add LOL! wink.gif )


[[ See you round the back of the bike sheds as planned trev, as always my lips are sealed ]]

Ooh er Ant you are a one wink.gif LOL! happy.gif

And on that note I'm dipping out of this conversation before I get myself into anymore trouble. wink.gif



--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

Re: No offence taken

July 15 2012, 12:09 PM 

LOL! wink.gif

____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

Em
(Login crackedemerald)
BW Member
99.116.250.157

Re: No offence taken

July 15 2012, 4:13 PM 

I'll just observe that these two gentlemen were the sex objects of millions - it went far beyond the details of gender. Both probably felt it their due to fuck each other - or at least pretend to.

"With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil, that takes religion." Steven Weinberg

 
 Respond to this message   

popp
(Login idnks)
80.60.67.254

Re: No offence taken

July 15 2012, 4:14 PM 

we know who has the bigger mouth happy.gif


----------------------------------------
what a beautiful thread, tell the others.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login trevorhalvo)
BW Member
92.0.107.205

Re: No offence taken

July 15 2012, 5:21 PM 

[[ we know who has the bigger mouth ]]


Well Bowie had the bigger cock! ( Lance of love and all that wink.gif)

Sorry I know I said I was dipping out of the conversation but I just couldn't resist happy.gif

--------------------------------------------
REALITY bites wink.gif
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
[linked image]
---------------------------------------------








 
 Respond to this message   

Ant
(Login earthling1O1O)
86.31.118.246

Re: No offence taken

July 15 2012, 8:44 PM 

"we know who has the bigger mouth happy.gif"

LOL!

Sure do wink.gif

[linked image]

____________________________
"Humming Rheingold
We scavenge up our clothes"
____________________________


[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   

Mt Obvious
(Login Dr.Ink)
BW Member
99.246.245.221

Re: No offence taken

July 19 2012, 3:33 AM 


 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - The Jagger-Bowie Rumor Rears Its Ugly Head (Again)
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Back to BowieWonderworld website