I understand that but....


I can think of much more modern International Carrier Aircraft than the Alpha Jet ( which is not Carrier Capable) and the Harrier, I mean there is the Mig-29k, Su-33, If you can get past they are non-Carrier capable, then there are the Eurofighter Typhoon, Rafale, I know it has to be multinational but they could have used more modern looking and more recognisable aircraft.

Like I said its just a small thing in a really good film.

Can anyone tell me though why whenever a city gets blown up in a Hollywood film it is nealry always New York lol.

Posted on May 8, 2012, 2:49 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

  1. Or Tokyo...... Barry, May 8, 2012
  2. Re: I understand that but..... , May 9, 2012
  3. "Not Carrier-capable", huh?. Webwolf, May 9, 2012
    1. Actually you are sort of right.. , May 9, 2012
      1. So instead of.... , May 9, 2012
        1. Ski Jump.. , May 9, 2012
          1. Whould you eat it?. , May 9, 2012
      2. In looking at surreptitiously-taken "screecaps".... Webwolf, May 9, 2012
      3. Re: Actually you are sort of right.. ChasersR4wimps, May 20, 2012

eXTReMe Tracker