Also

by Latrans

This is a fairly common trick for people traveling with expensive gear/equipment (such as cameras). Not only does it legally prevent the luggage from being opened, it ensures that it will arrive on time at the right place. No airline would want the scrutiny brought on by a 'lost firearm'.

I'm not too sure on the 'non-TSA approved' lock though. Shouldn't that be 'TSA approved' instead?

Posted on Jun 15, 2012, 6:56 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. The law specifically says it may NOT be a TSA logo lock. , Jun 15, 2012
    1. Just one problem.... , Jun 16, 2012
      1. Flare Guns count as well and are safer, legally.. , Jun 17, 2012
      2. Umm hate to object but... , Jun 17, 2012
        1. right, but.... , Jun 17, 2012
        2. Re: Umm hate to object but... , Jun 18, 2012
          1. There's a reason for that.. Ketira, Jun 18, 2012
    2. About TSA-approved locks.... Snowtroll, Jun 16, 2012
      1. Well, to be fair.... Robin Bobcat, Jun 17, 2012
        1. But an old suitcase with a strap and belt buckle does that!. Snowtroll, Jun 17, 2012
          1. Heh.... , Jun 17, 2012
    3. Aah. Makes sense.. Latrans, Jun 17, 2012

eXTReMe Tracker