Return  

Murf the Homer

April 30 2012 at 8:51 AM
No score for this post

dacow  (Login dacow)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Remember the Zeitler and DeCastro were rated the same statement by Murf, well here is a short comparison. I think the Bengals had a good draft but if they went guard, they should have taken DeCastro. Take a look:

Zeitler
Fox Sports scouting

Despite lacking some quickness to get to the next level, Zeitler can dominate the line of scrimmage and excelled in a system that breeds offensive linemen. Wisconsin had three offensive lineman selected in the 2011 draft and Zeitler will likely be chosen in either the second or third round this April.

Mocking the Draft

He is able to both protect the passer and open running lanes. Zeitler may not be as exciting as other prospects but he is solid and should be selected no later than the 3rd round.
Bold statement: Zeitler will be drafted no later than the 3rd round

Pro Football Weekly
Grade 6.07

CBS Sports

Rang (45) 15 in second round
Brugler (38) 6th pick second round
Prisco (24)
Judge (30)

DECASTRO

CBS

10th overall pick
Rang (11)
Brugler (11)
Prisco (18)
Judge (11)

Pro Football Weekly

Grade 6.22

Fox Sports
A sure-fire first-round pick

Mocking the Draft

Bold statement: DeCastro will be selected in the 1st round and the first interior lineman selected



I know we got the 93rd pick in the trade but if you are going to draft a guard, do you want the "BOLD statement He will be drafted by the 3rd round" guy or the "sure fire first round pick" guy? Guess who got the sure fire first round guy, the fukkin Steelers.


But hey, there were rated the same right Mike--- I mean Murf.


    
This message has been edited by dacow on Apr 30, 2012 8:53 AM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Response TitleAuthorDate
 Re: Murf the HomerHomeyApr 30, 2012, 9:37 AM
  Re: Murf the HomermurfApr 30, 2012, 10:03 AM
   Re: Murf the HomerHomeyApr 30, 2012, 10:13 AM
    Well now..dacowApr 30, 2012, 11:13 AM
     Re: Well now..HookApr 30, 2012, 1:16 PM
      Re: Well now..murfApr 30, 2012, 3:28 PM
       Re: Well now..HookApr 30, 2012, 3:33 PM
       Re: Well now.. Apr 30, 2012, 3:35 PM
        Re: *bengalbearApr 30, 2012, 4:37 PM
         Re: * Apr 30, 2012, 6:39 PM
          Re: *dacowApr 30, 2012, 6:47 PM
           Re: * Apr 30, 2012, 7:35 PM
            Re: * Apr 30, 2012, 8:04 PM
             Re: * Apr 30, 2012, 9:59 PM
              Re: *murfMay 1, 2012, 4:53 AM
               Re: *Sam WycheMay 1, 2012, 9:15 AM
                Re: *murfMay 1, 2012, 9:20 AM
                 Re: * May 1, 2012, 10:12 AM
                  From what I saw of the game filmOldSchoolerFanMay 1, 2012, 10:10 PM
                   All I know...dacowMay 2, 2012, 5:32 AM
                    Re: All I know... May 2, 2012, 8:26 PM
                     Re: All I know...murfMay 2, 2012, 11:49 PM
                      Not....dacowMay 3, 2012, 5:41 AM
                       Re: Not....Sam WycheMay 3, 2012, 6:41 AM
                        Re: Not....murfMay 3, 2012, 7:06 AM
                       Re: Not.... May 3, 2012, 6:15 PM
                        Re: Not.... May 4, 2012, 6:20 AM
                         Re: Not.... May 5, 2012, 7:20 PM
                          Re: Not....Synonymous BengalMay 5, 2012, 9:09 PM
                           Re: Not.... May 6, 2012, 11:40 AM
 Re: Murf the Homer May 21, 2012, 8:03 PM
  Re: Murf the HomermurfMay 23, 2012, 6:17 AM
   Re: Murf the HomerSynonymous BengalMay 23, 2012, 3:15 PM
 All Hail the Murfster! Dec 23, 2012, 4:44 PM
  Re: All Hail the Murfster!murfDec 23, 2012, 5:43 PM
   I would work for (blank)OldSchoolerFanDec 23, 2012, 5:53 PM
    Re: I would work for (blank) Dec 24, 2012, 1:17 PM
     Re: I would work for (blank)Sam WycheDec 26, 2012, 3:35 PM
      Re: I would work for (blank) Dec 26, 2012, 5:10 PM