<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return  

Do Steelers deserve *?

February 13 2009 at 9:45 AM
No score for this post

  (Login whit28)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

 
Man, heres an article degrading the Steelers dynasty


http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9217162/Do-juiced-up-Steelers-teams-deserve-asterisks?&MSNHPHMA

"If your not fired up with enthusiasm, you'll be fired with enthusiasm."- Vince Lombardi

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Synonymous Bengal
(Login CIN-C-STAR)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Do Steelers deserve *?

No score for this post
February 13 2009, 2:43 PM 

Not only were the 70s Stealers juiced, but I would bet that at least a couple players on the current Superbowl squad are using HGH, which the league doesn't test for despite safe and effective tests existing.

I hope the NFLPA looks at that and allows more rigorous testing so that football maintains its claim to being the most vigorous professional sport in terms of discouraging the use of illlegal and dangerous supplements, and so it doesn't got the way of baseball.

How are you going to suspend players for diuretics, and then not even test for HGH?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Do Steelers deserve *?

No score for this post
February 13 2009, 2:53 PM 

Sounds like a little b!tch crying.

What team was clean in the 70's?

This guy is a clown.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login CIN-C-STAR)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Do Steelers deserve *?

No score for this post
February 14 2009, 7:09 PM 

"What team was clean in the 70's?"

All of the one's that sucked.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Synonymous Bengal
(Login 0_16)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Give him the chair!

No score for this post
February 14 2009, 8:23 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(no login)

HGH Tests???

No score for this post
February 15 2009, 11:42 AM 

I was under the impression they still didn't have a reliable test for HGH. Can anyone enlighten me on this?

*************************************************************************************

I used to work at a fire hydrant factory. You could'nt park anywhere near the place.
Steven Wright

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login SaintsFanToo)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Roids in the 70s

No score for this post
February 17 2009, 6:33 PM 

Steroids were not banned in the NFL until 1981 and were not tested for until 87 I believe. They were easily obtainable by prescription before they were made a schedule III drug later.

Its hard to say the Stealers cheated since it was not against NFL rules or illegal to use them.

The NFL turned a blind eye to steroid use in the 70s since the bigger faster harder hitting players were making the game more exciting. It wasn't until Congress started snooping around that the NFL and Player's union finally did something about it lest they get told what to do.

Today's Stealer's are a different story.

_____________________________________________
January 6,1991: The last post season victory for the Bengals.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Synonymous Bengal
(Login CIN-C-STAR)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Roids in the 70s

No score for this post
February 17 2009, 7:06 PM 

JB:

Blood tests have been around for awhile that are safe and effective, but people complain that blood testing is a privacy violation.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/david_epstein/01/17/epstein.HGH/

Now they even have a urine test for HGH, though it probably has not been scientifically scrutinized as much as it should be before being used with people's careers on the line.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2008-07-22-hgh-urine-test_N.htm

You probably just thought they didn't exist because people like Bud Selig like to tell the media that these tests don't exist so thye can avoid looking like the pathetic enablers of the destruction of the game that they are.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

uscthree
(Login uscthree)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Roids in the 70s

No score for this post
February 17 2009, 9:24 PM 

Not only are the blood tests for HGH safe and effective, they are reliable as all get out. They've been tested and retested over and over and over. In science, repeating results are the key. Its called the Scientific Method. That's Science 101 in 7th grade folks. Here's the problem: The UNION. The GREAT OZ behind the curtain.

I have a pharmacy background and was heavily involved in the early 1990's in developing policy for drug testing in the workplace for the State of CA. Testing can be done for HGH. The science is there. You got to want to clean up the mess. That is the first step.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

uscthree
(Login uscthree)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Mike * Brown *

No score for this post
February 17 2009, 9:28 PM 

Almost forgot, the team that deserves an * is the Bengals. All these years and one winning season. All the while the team up in Pittsburgh picked high in the draft year after year and continues to this day to churn out winners. When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Mike Brown never heard any advice he did not detest.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Do Steelers deserve *?
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return  
Find more forums on NFLCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement