<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return  

Bungles @ FudgePackers WEEK 2 GAME THREAD

September 20 2009 at 2:11 AM
No score for this post

LoyaltyClause  (Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

percentage of teams that start the year 0-2 and reach the postseason: 12%
last time 85 had over 100 yards recieving: dec. 31st 2007
amount of days since Carson Palmer has won an NFL game: 672
cincy has lost last 4 games in Green Bay

*hint*hint* you won't be missing much if you can't watch the game, Packers 27 - Bengals 17
0-2 and on their way towards 0-3...

alas, i'll be watching as usual...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

OldSchoolerFan
(Login oldschoolerfan)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

I'm the only one that cares in Cali

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 2:51 AM 

Is there a radio link to this game? Help me. I need some laughs.

BTW--My final score prediction:

Green Bay 31
Cincinnati 13

Carson has another 2 or 3 picks--and convict fumbles. You don't win games with 4 TO's--if you do, you're extremely lucky, punk.





"So he got fired? Big deal. It's happened to the best of us. So he got kicked out of his house by his 400 lb'ed wife?!?!? That's probably better for him anyways."-OldSchooler on ChrisMBHater's absence

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

LoyaltyClause
(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I'm the only one that cares in Cali

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 3:23 AM 

"In the face of the oddsmakers and history, the Bengals.com roundtable thinks the Bengals will have it and bounce back"

haha, good ole hobspin

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Storm
(Login stormincincy)
MikeBrownSucks.com Forum Moderator

Re: I'm the only one that cares in Cali

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 4:53 AM 

in my pay league I am starting GBs Def and am going against Aaron Rodgers


so I am very interested in todays game

------------------------------------------
In Memory of Darren
[linked image]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
BungsBlowAnother
(Login TurdFegusson)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I'm the only one that cares in Cali

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 7:29 AM 

In their quest to go O-fer through October, the bungs will take a Packers' punking.

bungs 12
Packers 24

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I'm the only one that cares in Cali

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 10:37 AM 

I guess I am the only one watching Greenbay hold on every single play...not just holding, but obvious holding.
Ed started to grab his flag one time, then I guess was told not to throw it....????????????

Plus, the coverage of this game should be shown in every single class room across the country.
Students...this is called pathetic....don't ever put this kind of effort into anything.

Crocker gets called for PI...no replay at all...they show Rivers being hit by Hines last year...what exactly has that got to do with anything about this game...they played that replay last week too..honestly...this is pathetic.

Carson just got picked...eitehr very bad throw or Chad was going deep instead of an out route.

"Mom said that when I wear this badge you're supposed to treat me like a man of the law"
Officer Goofy Gilmore...aka TrooperHook

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I'm the only one that cares in Cali

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 10:41 AM 

Fat asz fullback has atleast 10 yards in front of him, but falls down...

Benson looks good...keep spreading them out and hitting the seems Brat, don't start stacking the middle of the line...stretch runs are working and giving you chance for play action....

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Synonymous Bengal
(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:17 AM 

4 picks in two games...talk about turning over the ball, just take the sack carson - its why we have a punter...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:39 AM 

Bengals getting nailed with flags left and right for holding and the fuching Packers line has been holding the entire fuching game.
2 piss poor flags on Crocker...the second one came out about 40 seconds after the play...
The announcers, are too worried about talking about everything else besides the action on the fuching field.

Pathetic CBS coverage

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:40 AM 

21-21 after a bad first half.
Where the fuch is Scott?
Benson is killing these guys on stretch runs...Scott gets one of those cutbacks and he is gone.

Brat needs to go.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:41 AM 

its looking like another close loss this week...i actually envy knowing we will lose in the 2nd quarter sometimes...palmer is on track for another 20+ int year, brat still doing predictable things...run run pass, throwing the TE on the flat on 3rd and long...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:49 AM 


Coats----bad game so far...fumble, 3 missed blocks.
Crocker--2 bad flags called on him, but still gettting torched in coverage.

Keep feeding Benson...give the rock to Scott on first down on a stretch play..or screen or something.
My God, use the talent you ahve on the roster, isntead of the sh!t players you are forced to use like Coats.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:51 AM 

did scott even make the trip to GB? i don't even see him on the sidelines...at least henry finally got a ball his way, and omg a td!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:58 AM 

but like they say, as the running backs get yardage the holes open up in the passing game...hate him all you want benson has looked like an 05 rudi today

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

must be locked in the Lumina
(Login 72360)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:05 PM 

Scott is in there on special teams #28

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymouse
(no login)

Video Link

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:11 PM 

http://www.p2p4u.net/

Its flash but it works

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:24 PM 

Coats needs to be cut..
he brings nothing to the table..someone on the waiver wire has to be out there to replace this worthless piece of sh!t.

Anyone notice the ref pushing the nt on the extra point?
Don't help him, throw the flag...is this instructional football?
Fuching amazing!


Plus, will continue to point out the flags...Bengals get nailed for holding...Packers don't.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: bungalized

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:25 PM 

Coats isn't even good at blocking...just a mediocre player all-around...where is chase coffman on that route?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

OldSchoolerFan
(Login oldschoolerfan)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

One positive outlook on this game is

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:32 PM 

Marvin Lewis can outcoach Mike McCarthy, I THINK. McCarthy is a dumb azz at messing up clock management on the bible proportion scale.

I swear--the NFC North is the greatest collection of dumb coaches ever. You have Lovie, McCarthy, Childress, and whomever the idiot is that the Fords hired. LOL!!!! Man, that's pretty bad.





"So he got fired? Big deal. It's happened to the best of us. So he got kicked out of his house by his 400 lb'ed wife?!?!? That's probably better for him anyways."-OldSchooler on ChrisMBHater's absence

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: One positive outlook on this game is

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:35 PM 

ODOM--- 5 sacks in 2 games....

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: One positive outlook on this game is

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:36 PM 

odom is looking like he's worth the contract finally...wish geathers could get in the action

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

LSF
(Login LoyalSeahawkFan)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

I Can't BELIEVE...

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:36 PM 

..that there were BENGALS fans in the front row of LAMBEAU field. Anyone who pays that much money to root for the Suckcinnatti GayGals needs intensive therapy.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I Can't BELIEVE...

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:43 PM 

Was that a facemask on Leanord on the screen play?
Looked like it, but we wouldn't fuching know, b/c this pathetic coverage fails to ever show a fuching replay!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I Can't BELIEVE...

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:49 PM 

I guess i missed the rules change that allowed Al Harris to do whatever he wants with the ball in the air....
Pathetic

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I Can't BELIEVE...

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:56 PM 

here's a question...why do you keep jerome simpson let alone draft him in the first place and instead we have to drop dede dorsey

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I Can't BELIEVE...

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:58 PM 

I give up...no field goal, not going for it?

Kiss my azz Marvin...you suck

TRY TO WIN THE FUCHING GAME YOU SH!T COACH.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: I Can't BELIEVE...

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 12:59 PM 

So with 4 minutes left in the game, you give them the ball back and only gained 21 yards?
Are you fuhcing serious?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

OldSchoolerFan
(Login oldschoolerfan)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Moonlight can't kick a 52 yarder?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:00 PM 

LMAO. Just kidding--but seriously though Marv. You go for the win, not field position. If Benson can't pick up a 4th and 1--then you have no business being in the game in the 1st place.




"So he got fired? Big deal. It's happened to the best of us. So he got kicked out of his house by his 400 lb'ed wife?!?!? That's probably better for him anyways."-OldSchooler on ChrisMBHater's absence

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Moonlight can't kick a 52 yarder?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:02 PM 

Marvin got lucky that Rogers made a poor throw...Cosby again....sweeeeeet.

Run the clock...kick the fuching field goal....game over.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Moonlight can't kick a 52 yarder?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:07 PM 

Again, no replay, I wanted to see who stood there and did not block on the 3rd and 2...Benson seemed p!ssed...
These guys are pathetic.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Moonlight can't kick a 52 yarder?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:12 PM 

Correction...ODOM 7 sacks in 2 games

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Moonlight can't kick a 52 yarder?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:17 PM 

NO! No!

Why is Coats on the fuching hands team?
Are you serious?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Moonlight can't kick a 52 yarder?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:18 PM 

As i said before he kicked it...why is Coats on the hands team?
Marvin you suck azz...you need to be fired today if you lose this game.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

The Swamp Rat
(Login deweywarren)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Here we go again!

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:19 PM 

Leon Hall will tip a pass to somebody for a GB TD!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

The Swamp Rat
(Login deweywarren)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Another patented Bengal Finish

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:21 PM 

But somehow we got Ed Hoculi instead of Mike Carey!!!

BTW - CBS switched from the Bengal game to the Bears game with 1:30 left to go. SO we missed seeing the GB field goal and our botched onside kick.


    
This message has been edited by deweywarren on Sep 20, 2009 1:24 PM
This message has been edited by deweywarren on Sep 20, 2009 1:22 PM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

murf
(Login murf129)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:23 PM 

A win is a win, but Marvin is not a head coach...
Sorry azz coach at best.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:31 PM 

can somebody post the picture of the two dumbazz hicks celebrating?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Katie
(Login KaBTK)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:55 PM 

11-5!  Division Champs!

 

[linked image]



-------------------------------------------
James Brown: What do you say to your team after a loss like that, Coach?

Bill Cowher: Well, I tell them we have to play that situation. You have to make sure you have a safety deep there. You had everyone running at Marshall and Stokley was uncovered. You've got to play that situation better.

Boomer Esiason: No, you have no idea what you'd say in that situation, because you never had to deal with that situation in Pittsburgh. Only us in Cincinnati can actually know what it's like.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

shapu
(Login shapu)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 2:18 PM 

You know, all other things being equal, this was a good win, and the defense held (admittedly, it is the packers they're playing, but still).

A win is a win. You only get 16 chances before January, so you might as well take what you can get.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 2:19 PM 

hahaha thank you katie...you have to figure the laws of averages say that MAYBE we can squeak out a win against the squealers next week? im only going on the law of averages, however...not the law of mike brown...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Katie
(Login KaBTK)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 2:34 PM 

Daniel Coats?  Why is this guy still on the team?  He's a butterfingers.  I always say to look out when a ball is thrown his way because he drops it.  He dropped at least two, and he fumbled one.  He was lucky to recover it.  I cringe everytime he gets the ball.  He was the same way last year.  He dropped key balls last year.  I remember him dropping one in the endzone.  It's a dang shame that Reggie and Ben are out.  Although, it seems like they could find a better player on the waiver wires than Coats.

I'm still simmering that they cut Dorsey.  I know they need Coats for blocking, but I would have loved to have had Dorsey in on third downs.  I hardly saw Leonard or Scott either.  I think I only saw them on a couple plays.  I don't understand why you have this talent and don't want to use it.

I knew the game wasn't over when the Bengals were up 10.  The Bengals didn't go for it on 4th, and the Packers got the ball back.  I had that sick feeling in the pit of my stomach.  I was a bit suprised when Green Bay went for the field goal, but I just knew they would get the onside kick.  Sure enough.  Honestly, all I could do was laugh.  It was either that or cry.  The announcer asked, "Can lighting strike twice for the Bengals?"  Do bears crap in the woods?  There was a brief moment when I thought GB would possibly tie it up, but we managed to win.  It was close, and this game could have easily went into overtime where we lost again.



-------------------------------------------
James Brown: What do you say to your team after a loss like that, Coach?

Bill Cowher: Well, I tell them we have to play that situation. You have to make sure you have a safety deep there. You had everyone running at Marshall and Stokley was uncovered. You've got to play that situation better.

Boomer Esiason: No, you have no idea what you'd say in that situation, because you never had to deal with that situation in Pittsburgh. Only us in Cincinnati can actually know what it's like.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login LoyaltyClause)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 2:51 PM 

im a little curious about our cornerbacks, both have very bright futures but have struggled with a lot of injury problems and inconsistency in the past...did anyone check who was lined up on Jennings? he had a huge blanket covering him all day...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login theydey)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Are the Packers worse than the Bengals?

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 5:30 PM 

The MVP in the game for the Bungs was their punter. Without him they lose. The fact that the Green Bay offensive lineman did not hurt things either.

As for the win, don't let it fool you. Baaa, baaa, baaafore you know it, the Steal Curtain will bring you all back to reality.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Sam Wyche
(Login wyche)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Another patented Bengal Finish

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 9:32 PM 

[quote]

BTW - CBS switched from the Bengal game to the Bears game with 1:30 left to go. SO we missed seeing the GB field goal and our botched onside kick.

[/quote]

Same here...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

ItmightbeJB
(Login ItmightbeJB)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Another patented Bengal Finish

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 9:57 PM 

In response to an earlier comment about Jerome Simpson, I think the reason he's still on the team is that he was a 2nd round draft choice. But even more importantly than that I think he was a MikeyBoy pick from the get-go. I can picture the coaching staff ralphing into their KFC buckets after MB told them it would be really "nifty" to have a guy from Coastal Carolina on the squad. Most 2nd round picks are starters by this time.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Homey
(Login HomerSaysDoh)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Another patented Bengal Finish

No score for this post
September 21 2009, 4:08 AM 

But even more importantly than that I think he was a MikeyBoy pick from the get-go

Exactly, and thats how Mikey judges his drafts by how long they are in the NFL..pathetic.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login psychostats)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Did it come down to this?

No score for this post
September 21 2009, 5:41 AM 

If Roy Williams doesn't clock Donald Lee on the Packers final drive, the Packers don't lose a timeout or suffer a time runoff. Without that play, the Bengals might easily have blown it. That was one awful prevent defense they were playing.

http://cmsimg.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?NewTbl=1&Avis=U0&Dato=20090920&Kategori=PKR0201&Lopenr=909200805&Ref=PH&Item=21&Maxw=600&Maxh=500

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Sam Wyche
(Login wyche)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

Re: Did it come down to this?

No score for this post
September 21 2009, 6:18 AM 

Well, my thoughts (keeping in mind that I missed all of the excitement at the end because the CBS broadcast swithced):

-the defense looked good. The Packers have a very good offense. Like I said elsewhere, I'm not sure how they were not able to adjust to Odom, but that happens. As a whole the defense did its job.

-cudos to the offense for establishing the run...like it or not, that is the blueprint for winning. Just look around the league. With the exception of Brees through two games, other QBs who have chucked it around have had disappointing starts for their teams (a'la Big Ben, Phillip Rivers, Matt Hasselbeck, and Tom Brady, all four teams have yet to establish the run this year and are all a disappointing [for them] 1-1). Good job by the O-line and Benson.

-Palmer threw the two picks but the passing game at least regained that rhythm that they've had in the past

-Coles is a DOG! Sure, he had his first TD, but 2 catches for 9 yards...all of you who considered him an upgrade over Housh should bow to me and admit your stupidity. I love to say "I told you so." Well, "I told you so."

-Benson still does fumble...for once the Bungs had most of the luck going their way. First time maybe since their win in Pittsburgh in '06 that they got most bounces/breaks.

-was that Murf with the orange and black striped cheesehead at Lambeau?

-with the Pittsburgh loss, the Bungs are tied in second after two weeks! Hooray!

-too bad that I missed the ending...that would have probably changed my perception. Then again, too bad I missed the ending to the Denver game also, but through highlights I got to relive that disaster!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


(Login psychostats)
Approved MikeBrownSucks.com Members

A Postscript

No score for this post
September 21 2009, 8:00 PM 

In case anybody cares, the Packers admit that the penalty at the end of the game was correct.

"I was 100 percent wrong," McCarthy said Monday. "With the play that we ran there, and we run it every Friday, the perimeter players are already down there. Its a vertical pass concept. Really, the challenge is to get to the (offensive) line (set). Sixteen seconds is the max. I would not have tried that if it was 15 seconds. We were right at the max point. We knew it when we called the play. I was watching the line because thats the challenge, and I felt the line was set. But watching the film, we had two perimeter players that were both moving on the snap of the ball, so I felt the call was correct."


http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20090921/PKR01/90921190/1058

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Bungles @ FudgePackers WEEK 2 GAME THREAD
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return