http://justiceformarissa.blogspot.com/2012/04/lincoln-b.html

I don't see Ed Shultz running this story every 2 seconds and screaming about the Stand your ground law.
I don't see the anti-gun nuts protesting for this law to be erased off the books.
I don't see MSNBC showing Jeb Bush inking this deal and then saying that Bush supports Romney.
I don't see any of the liberal morons denouncing this law using this story as a back drop.

Embarrassing!


Eric Holder should be fired...

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/04/17/secretive-doj-force-watces-trayvon-protests/

Now we know why he refuses to charge the Black Panthers.
Understand I don't have a problem with this "secret" group trying to put flames out before something happens, but when you start to assist one side of the issue, it screams of a big problem.
The argument from Zimmerman is not only going to be not guilty but to not receive a fair trial.
When the DOJ is behind the curtain before he is ever even charged, what on earth do you think is going on behind the scenes now?

Fast and Furious.
Wanting to give top coward a civil trial in New York.
Giving a coward an option to stop talking to CIA and FBI interrogators.
Releasing doc. about interrogations jeopardizing several avenues of security
Black Panthers voter intimidation case.
Black Panthers bounty case.

WOW!

http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

It's kind of funny to me how obsessed some of you seem with the "Black Panthers" group.

Honestly, they probably don't make my list of top 1,000 concerns facing this country, but you'd think they were responsible for some major atrocities lately the way they are constantly brought up.

They are about as much of a threat right now as the Klan. They are dieing to be relevant again, and you guys are happy to try and oblige.

"We do do, and we do it at a very, very high level," Lewis said.

It's kind of funny to me how obsessed some of you seem with Zimmerman.

Honestly, he probably doesn't make my list of top 1,000 concerns facing this country, but you'd think he was responsible for some major atrocities lately the way he is constantly brought up.

He is about as much of a threat right now as the Klan. He is dieing to be a victim, and you guys are happy to try and oblige.

See what I did there?

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who undertsand binary, and those who do not.

CIN, the issue is, your boy has given the BP complete impunity. That should heal racial tension.

The Panthers are not a "threat" to anyone with a brain..
That is not the point, the point is a racist militant group is breaking federal laws and the DOJ not only ignores it, then tries to cover it up and the last thing on this planet this country needs is the DOJ working with people behind the scenes.

The reason I keep bringing it up is b/c the FEDERAL GOVERNEMNT SENT OUT A LETTER WARNING PEOPLE ABOUT WHITE CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS THAT HAVE A STRONG RELIGIOUS BACKGROUND THAT MIGHT MIGRATE TO MILITANT GROUPS.

Have very little evidence that is a problem in this day and age but on the other hand, we are watching Farhakahn make threats to white people and you have the Black Panthers not only making threats to white people but placing a dead or alive bounty on a human being and standing outside a poling center with clubs to intimidate people.

Ignore this?
Only a moron would ignore this.



http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

The white and black hate groups will continue to emerge and intensify the closer we get to the elections and add the OWS group in and we might see some fireworks this year. Limbaugh will also stir the pot also and don't forget Ted Nugent who is heavy into this extremist stuff also. Looks like my predictions of class and race warfare could very well happen as all these extremist groups come to a head. Might see some heavy confrontations between all these groups this year. Remember the Dec 22 date and see if that plays into things also.

I don't care if all hate groups meet in the dessert and have a last man standing type of ending...
My problem is the President of the United States and his boy allowing a group to continue to break Federal Laws and when asked to answer to that, they ignore it.

Eric Holder should have been fired a long time ago.
The Hypocrisy and flat out arrogance has to wake some people up and get him the hell out of the White House.



http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

Still cant find anything about an organized Black Panther group in 2012. All I have seen is the ramblings of some Mohammed idiot.

"Insert witty quotation here"

Bronco, try New Black Panther Party.

Hmmmmmm

http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm

"Insert witty quotation here"

Huey Newton disowns New Black Panther Party, he's just saying he's too old to give a crap anymore. He probably wised up.

http://dayofactionmovement.org/index2.html

Bronco, you can use semantics all you want to deny that there is a hate group other than a white hate group. How much more white guilt will you have to go through until you feel exonerated? Hope you find atonement some day.

I just want some proof they are organzied and not a couple of idiots at a rally with a bull horn.

You guys make it seem like they are an army.

"Insert witty quotation here"

What is "White Guilt"?

"Insert witty quotation here"

"See what I did there?"


Be hilarious?!?!?!?!?!? And it was. Nice job!


And did I read something about Huey Lewis and the News????? Damn. Good racism and Huey. Awesome.

(Before one of you jackazzes responds about "wrong Huey", idiot...I know who f*cking Huey was--IT'S CALLED SARCASM. LOOK IT UP. Draw sure as hell did--and he's good at it too.)

What is "White Guilt"?
~~~~~~~~~~~
LMAO!

What you are refusing to see here are the facts.
I don't care if the New Black Panther Party has 4 members or 4 million.
The Panthers or whatever they want to call themselves are breaking FEDERAL LAWS and getting away with it.
The Federal Government issued a warning to watch out for evil white bastrds that have strong christian values, but shut down an investigation into a voter intimidation case where there was VIDEO of the crime all over the news.
The Federal Government is watching a racist hate group place a dead or alive bounty on someones head, and did not even have the decency to offer a comment on it after the family even sent a letter to the DOJ about the bounty.

Do you not see the problem here?






http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

So you are saying its an organized group and not an idiot with a bullhorn?
I dont see where that is the case.

What is White Guilt? Instead of LMAO, how about you answer the question.



"Insert witty quotation here"

Bronco, I will define IRONIC for you: It is when a white boy, bends over backwards and dismisses evidence in an attempt to forgive or excuse the actions of a black hate group while, in the very same post, asks what white guilt is.

Wait, what evidence is there of a black group?
You guys are fukkiung paranoid.

If you want the President and the AG to go around and lasso up everyone with a bullhorn in this country of 300 million, you are nuts.

You didnt hear me asking Barry to arrest Ted Nugent, did you?

"Insert witty quotation here"

Are you seriously trying to deny that the Black Panthers exist?

C'mon, you are better than that.
I know this is a direct shot at your beloved leader, and you can't handle his failures, but give me a break here.

This is not about some loud mouth idiot, nobody on this planet is more of a loud mouthed idiot than Farrakhan and I don't run around asking for him to be charged with breaking Federal laws, b/c he does not break the law, he talks stupid and has mentally challenged people following him, but I don't recall him trying to INTIMIDATE VOTERS or PLACING A BOUNTY ON A HUMAN.

Eric Holder should have been fired a long time ago, but for some reason the very people that went ape sh!t over Alberto Gonzalez firing 8 Prosecutors have been very silent about the lack of competence and accountability from the DOJ under Obama and Holder.
That is the typical liberal agenda, but it also destroys the credibility of the DOJ, when they send special groups to a town to assist protesters.
It destroys the integrity of the Office when you see a militant racist hate group get away with breaking very serious civil rights laws.

White Guilt?
The easy answer would be....a liberal
But, it is deeper than that.
Google it..lol
There have been studies and books written on this mental desease.

http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

minutemen with glock



Wheres the outrage? Hahaha

Bronco are you seriously trying to claim the New Black Panther Party doesn't exist? Or that it isn't an organized group but only some guy with a bullhorn? I expected better of you but I guess when your only news sources are the Daily Kos and other George Soros funded groups I should forgive the ignorance.

Your own Justice Dept. disagrees with you because they initially filed voter intimidation charges against both the group and the two individuals in the group who stood outside the voting place in Philadelphia with billy clubs in an obvious attempt to scare caucasians away. Those charges were being pursued until Eric Holder personally stopped the action.

This is the same group that called for the capture and bounty for Zimmerman. Here's a link for you....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case

Now kiss murf and Homey and tell them they were right all along

Maybe this will help...

http://dayofactionmovement.org/

Not bad for a group that doesn't exist..

Thanks, Jawa. That is the first link to a site for this group. It appears they are a small group. I have seen high school kids make more sophisticated websites than that piece of garbage. As such, I am still unconcerned about said "group" on a national level. I take that back, I am not concerned about them on a state level. Clearly, they are a joke.

Let's be real for a second. The best reward they could offer was $10,000? LOL
Some families offer more than that for a missing person. Its not big time money. Its a joke. They are a joke.

The fact that you white guys on the board got roped into thinking they are a "threat" jsut reinforces my opinion of how right wing commentators can easily manipulate their listeners. You guys are SERIOUSLY WORRIED about these idiots?

Im more worried about the punk high school kids in my neighborhood than these morons.

By the way, JB, please dont cite to wikipedia. Courts dont recognize it as a legitimate reference so neither will I. This is most likely due to the fact that anyone can add content to wiki.

I am laughing that you guys have your panties bunched up over a barely flash website.

If it makes you feel better, ok, they are a group. Not just an idiot with a bulhorn.

It appears its an idiot with a bullhorn and a friend that barely understands flash software.



"Insert witty quotation here"

"I am laughing that you guys have your panties bunched up over a barely flash website."


OK, guilty white guy frivolous lawsuit type man--what if this was a "white hispanic" group offering the reward for anybody threatening anybody's life that goes on for the $10,000 hit?

You would lose your mind over that, Mr. Dismissal.

You're sick in the head.





"So he got fired? Big deal. It's happened to the best of us. So he got kicked out of his house by his 400 lb'ed wife?!?!? That's probably better for him anyways."-OldSchooler on ChrisMBHater's absence

I cannot imagine if the tables were turned what an outcry there would have been over this:

In July 2009, Mr. Smith requested a meeting with the head of the Justice Department's Voting Rights Section in order to discuss whether political appointees had been involved in the decision to narrow the case, stating that news reports contradicted the justice department's earlier claim that political appointees had not been involved, and that earlier congressional inquiries about this had been unsuccessful.[19] Smith and Wolf also requested that the voter intimidation charges which had been previously been dropped be refiled.[20] In January 2010, after several unsuccessful attempts at obtaining the requested information from the department, Mr. Wolf sought a resolution of inquiry that would have forced the Justice Department to provide Congress with the details of why it narrowed the case. In a vote along party lines, the resolution was defeated 15-14.[21]

From:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case

How this was not voter intimidation boggles the mind. The again, Eric Holder can't even write a three-page paper when required to do by the 5th Circuit.

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who undertsand binary, and those who do not.

Wow. The "I want to be a white victim" mantra really seems to be in overdrive.

I was surprised to read JB's comment that Eric Holder personally dropped a criminal voter intimidation charge, because that didn't remotely connect in my memory bank. So a quick Wikipedia review of JB's own referenced link cleared that up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case

There were no criminal charges filed. There was a civil suit filed. The decision to drop it was based on a number of issues, but a couple of them were:

Not one voter, white or otherwise, filed a complaint of intimidation.

An investigating police officer determined there was no probable cause to arrest either of the two individuals on any charge. He apparently advised one of the jokers to move along, and that joker did. The other dufus was a certified poll watcher.

And much to my surprise, even though no criminal charges were filed at any level or under any administration, the New Black Panther Parter condemmed the behavior of the jokers and suspended the Philadephia Chapter.

Civil Law is not my forte, but by its nature, there has to be damages. Without any "victims" seeking redress for damages, and not so much as a misdemeanor criminal charge filed on behalf of anyone, I sort of understand why a civil case didn't have much in the way of legs.

This hyped up indignation sort of reminds me of the frenzied story about the Muslim Judge in Pennsylvania who announced Sharia Law to dismiss assault charges against a brother Muslim who admitted assaulting a protester....except that the judge wasn't Muslim (he was a decorated American combat veteran to boot), he never mentioned Sharia Law, only US Law, there were no charges filed from the local police because they determined no assault occurred and the perpetrator, it turned out, made absolutely no admission of assault.

The right wing hacks who tried to stir up phony outrage over that story remind me of the victim wannabes that try to stir up phony outrage over the Philadelphia story. I'm amused, but no longer surprised, how the victim puppeters get the gullibe so riled up.

It seems a lot of people want to be outraged, and life degenerates into a constant quest for victimhood. Frankly, I see the same trait in some radical liberal groups as well, but the volume of phony right wing victimhood is defeaning these days.

"Not one voter, white or otherwise, filed a complaint of intimidation."

And there it is.
Next issue.
Game, set, match.

I am an expert on "civil litigation" issues.
There are zero damages in that case. None. Nada. Zilch.

And that is coming from an ambulance chaser.

"Insert witty quotation here"

uh Bronco, after stating this...

"By the way, JB, please dont cite to wikipedia. Courts dont recognize it as a legitimate reference so neither will I. This is most likely due to the fact that anyone can add content to wiki. "


You do your customary "game set match" by citing a Wikipedia quote. LOL Do you do that in court "game, set, match, your honor"

GWS 101....
Deny it happend or when faced with the facts that can't be denied, twist the facts into something else and repeat the same liberal horse sh!t over and over....

#1 The Black Panthers are not a threat to anyone with a brain, but they are a racist hate group just like every white power neo nazi racist hate group.
You try to dismiss them as some small group of people, but when you believe that you have something to use, you talk about how they fired the chapter in Philly, now are they a small group of people or are they a Nation wide group with Chapters in cities all across this country?

#2 I was not talking about a civil lawsuit over the voter intimidation charge..I was talking about the DOJ ot charging them with a Federal Crime and when some people in the office wanted to pursue charges, they were shut down.

#3 It is a Federal Crime to place a bounty on anyone's head. There is no getting around that fact.
Nobody has been charged even after the victims family requested an investigation.
The integrity of the office is being damaged with these clowns in charge.

People like Trooper are the problem.
When faced with undeniable evidence that we are watching an Administration not only fail the American people, but show a blatant disregard to uphold the integrity of the most important Office in the land, they try to cower and hide behind a bunch of liberal horse sh!t and call it things like "wannabe white vitcims".
Your pathetic.

Turn the tables on this..
Neo-Nazi's are dressed in some clown military gear and stand outside a polling center yelling ni^*** from to time and asking black people how it is going to feel to have a white man as their leader while brandishing a weapon.

Then have a white man in charge of the DOJ, go against the lead investigator and shut down the case.
Then have the same white man, send a special "secret" group to assist in a protest over a racial incident where whites are marching for a justice over a black man shooting a white man.
Then have the same white man, ignore many request for an investigation into a bounty that a neo-nazi group placed on a black mans head dead or alive.

The false outrage would send this country into a tailspin.
If you even attempt to deny that, you are an idiot!

It is not about "victimhood" it is about common sense.
Stop crying about equality and all of that other bullsh!t if you don't see the problem here.
I am not a victim and will never be a victim, have too much pride and take accountability for my own actions.
I just point out the sick and twisted hypocrisy of the liberal whack jobs and the government officials that bend over and take it in the azz b/c of white guilt.

http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/14/AR2010071405880.html

Looks to me that Civil charges were filed, then narrowed. The former administration said there was enough evidence to charge.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX4dcvIYk9A&feature=related

It boggles my mind that the Dems will fight tooth and nail the ID requirement to vote, because it may chill voting of the poor, BUT THIS IS ACCEPTABLE!



There are 10 types of people in this world, those who undertsand binary, and those who do not.

Murf,

Are you also angry with the AG of that state? With the prosecutor of that county? With the city attorney?

Why only the anger towards Holder?

If a bounty was placed and it involved the threat of violence, it could be handled by local, state and federal authorities, correct? Why does only Holder and Barry receive your anger?

Draw, what was the crime? Are you referencing the heresay? Which voters turned away? Did those voters call the cops? Call anyone? You practice law too, man. from my glance at this, it appears the only charge that may have any staying power may stem from carrying the billy clubs.

However, and this is up for debate, I think in Pennsylvania, you are allowed to carry billy clubs. I dont believe its against the law.

I saw the video. Not much there, dont you agree?

I am 100% against voter intimidation, but I am not sure a crime was committed here.
I think the only way you get an arrest is if there is probable cause that a voter was intimidated, right? If there are no complaints, that charge falls on its face.



"Insert witty quotation here"

I would actually be inclined to agree with you that there is not a lot there. But for the love of god if you believe for a second that white people could do 1/10 of that amount of intimidation and get away with it, you are living in fantasyland.

My point is the Dems scream so loudly about voter disenfranchisement, but this is acceptable.

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who undertsand binary, and those who do not.

Let me be clear. I think these punks are a-holes.

However, Im trying to see if they violated the law. It is freaking close, but that video seems to exonerate them.

Plus, had one person complained to the cops that they felt intimidated and did not vote, then you have something to go on.

"Insert witty quotation here"

Obama is the head man in charge.
Holder is the top DOJ official.

The violation is a FEDERAL crime, so that falls into the hands of the FEDS.

On Zimmerman...

Now that there is real evidence of Zimmerman bleeding, it makes this case even more of an issue for me.
How can they charge him with murder if he was indeed protecting himself?
I understand he might have been a racist azz wipe for profiling the kid, but that is not a crime.

Duke Rape Case 2.0..just as I said it was when the story became the liberal war cry against the mass killings of innocent unarmed black children by the blue eyed devils.

Every member of the MSNBC family should be fired and face lawsuits for defamation.

http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

Admit it, Murf. You're prideless, factless and witless. You are the textbook victim wannabe.

Part of your victimhood is that you still don't know what the adults are saying. So you just try to parrot the lines from your puppet masters. You'll never quite be able to engage in the thought process, but you try and try to recite nursery rhymes.

Draw,

So you think this is an example of white voter disenfranchisement?

Does out country have a history of white voter disenfranshisement?
Does one example like this compare well with 200 years of voter discrimination? Hmmmmm.

"Insert witty quotation here"

Trooper...
What the fuch are you talking about?
Do you take fuching medication for mental illness or something?

Dispute the facts, or show pure evidence that I am making anything up or shut the fuch up!
Of course you will tuck tale, talk in circles or twist the facts to make your mentally challenged brain believe that you are right.
(still waiting for you or your boy toy BA to provide evidence that I am a racist from a few years back)


Bronco...
I don't care if there is a history of 200 years of wrong, ignoring this racist hate group in 2012 shows dishonest behavior from the most important office in the land.
If you can't trust the DOJ to represent the people in a fair and unbiased nature, then we might as well join the 3rd world countries across the pond and allow tribes to rule certain parts of the land.

You can't have equality by tilting the scales to the other side and say "well you whitey types did this 60 years ago".
That is recipe for a disaster and that disaster is being fueled by incompetence by the President and Holder.
As lawyer I would hope that you would agree...



http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

I dont support any dicrimination, murf.

I just dont see a crime here under the letter of the law.

No one died.
No got hit.
No one got threatened.
Nothing happened.

Two black guys showed up in trench coats and had a billy club on their person.
Two guys out of 300 million.

No other instances of anything like this happened in the thousands of voting polls across the country.

And you have your panties in a bunch because the President is not paying attention to this.

Bigger fish to fry?

And it doesnt matter if you think its a Federal matter. If it is a crime, it can also be a state matter and a local matter.

Get mad at the cops, the prosecutors and the AG's office. They all failed you here.

Its not just Barry and Eric.


"Insert witty quotation here"

Today I learned the Black Panthers still exist..

I understand that, but when the DOJ ignored this case and then behaves like they have behaved in the Zimmerman case, it hurts that integrity of the office.

The voter intimidation case speaks volumes.
Yes, you are correct, it was only 2 people that did not touch anyone, but by brandishing a weapon, calling out white people and asking white people how it is going to feel to be under a black man, that is 100% intimidation.
You know what will happen if a neo-nazi group did the same thing.

I am just asking for a fair and balanced and unbiased Department of Justice to protect the citizens of this land.
I don't care what took place 60 years ago, I was not alive and had nothing to do with anything that took place.
I don't care that it was just 2 people, they represented a group that has now shown a blatant disregard for the rules and nobody in power seems to care.
Add that to the slap in the face to the white christian soldiers that are being profiled after volunteering to go to a war zone and the instant knee jerk reaction from the President and Holder over this Zimmerman case and you start to get a very uncomfortable feeling about the integrity of the people in charge.


Sorry, but Holder should have to answer to this and resign and if he does not, the President should be a leader of this country and fire him for neglect of duty and incompetence
He should have resigned after the Fast and Furious issue or the voter intimidation case but this one tops them all.

How can you as a lawyer have faith in a system that is performing below standards?

http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

Murf, reading probably isn't much more in your skill set than grammar. But your rantings are not facts. Bronco summarized the facts very simply. Surely a moron could grasp them....please don't disgrace your brotherhood.

No one got hit. No one claimed they were hit. No one claimed they were disenfranchised. No one brandished a weapon in violation of Philadelphia Law. No local law enforcement saw fit to write criminal charges for as much as littering, much less a felony. No law enforcement entity at any local, state or national level saw fit to file criminal charges...including the DOJ under Bush.

You're so desperate to parrot your puppetmasters that you would most likely ignore the facts even if you could comprehend them. But if being a doltish victim gives you a sense of life purpose, I'm not here to deny you. On the other hand, I won't stop laughing at you either.

Why don't you spare yourself the humiliation? You constantly get killed on these pages when you try to debate with the grownups. You don't have the mental capacity for cognition. And for you to tell someone to shut up? Murf, a blowhard like you is the classic pansie. You'll never be in the league of authority.

"Does out country have a history of white voter disenfranshisement?
Does one example like this compare well with 200 years of voter discrimination? Hmmmmm. "


It doesn't excuse it.

I still have a hard time believing any whities were "disenfranchised" here.
Any complaints filed by citizens that voted there?
Bueller? Bueller?

"Insert witty quotation here"

Murf,

I dont see any parallels between the Martin case and the case of the New Black Panthers who you claim intimidate voters, yet no voters complained.

I am trying to see your justification for the Attorney General of the USA to get invovled in this non-issue.

Who is he protecting? Who are the victims?



"Insert witty quotation here"

The voter intimidation case is not the main issue here, it is a subplot to the over all incompetence of the office when you look at the big picture.

I do see a HUGE problem with having 2 black men dressed in some generic military uniform and holding a club while making comments to white voters.
If that is not voter intimidation, then I don't know what is besides beating people for trying to vote.
Some in the DOJ felt it was intimidation and Holder shut down the investigation and the lead investigator resigned in protest.
BUT again, that is not my biggest complaint and that is not why I believe that he should resign or be fired.

He should be removed from office for the Fast & Furious issue on top of this bounty issue.
The bounty issue is a very big deal!!!!!

As I keep stating, when you add all of these things up and pay attention to the rules being changed/ignored or skirted, it reduces the trust of the office and it directly questions the integrity of the office.


Now ..my rantings are fact dip sh!t..(trooper)

FACTS that can not be denied by anyone with an intelligence level above the 2nd grade.

#1) 2 black men wearing military gear and holding a weapon stand outside of a polling place during an election.
While standing there, several people reported that these men barked racist comments at them about a black man being their leader and calling people racist names.
Can not dispute those facts at all, unless you are mentally challenged.

#2) It is illegal at the Federal Level to place a bounty on another humanbeing.
Can not dispute that the same group that was being represented in the voter intimidation case, is the group that called for a bounty DEAD OR ALIVE of an american citizen.

#3) The Head of DOJ is the supreme boss of that office.
That office sent in a "secret" group to Florida to meet with protesters to assist them in their protest.
That office has received letters from the family of Zimmerman requesting an investigation into the bounty and they have been ignored.

So now do you want to say it is a rant or try and talk in circles and deny the FACTS of the case, the same fuching FACTS that I have been stating in this entire debate or do you want to tuck tale and shut the fuch up yet?





http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

"In April 2009 Bartie Bull, a former civil rights lawyer who was serving as a poll watcher at the polling station where the incident occurred, submitted an affidavit at Justice's request supporting the lawsuit, stating that he considered it to have been the most severe instance of voter intimidation he had ever encountered.[2][5]"

Bronco, the poll workers even said some people turned around and left without voting. Still don't think whitey was disenfranchised? Seriously, you doing some black chick and have to toe the line or else Bronco doesn't get his giggity giggity or what?

April of 2009?

"Insert witty quotation here"

What sources said they barked racist remarks to voters?
Certainly none of the voters did, correct?

That part of the story sounds like fantasyland made up by commentators.
Or is it just "unknown sources". LOL

Or was the only one who said it happened, was Bartie Bull?
Why didn't any of the voters complain?

No response to Bronco's questions from last night yet Murf? Why is that? Did you just get caught lying again?

It's a common malaise for the victim wannabes.

LMAO...
Homer gave a response to the question and of course, the typical liberal spin was to dismiss the information or degrade where the information came from.
I was not there and guess what jackazz, you were not there so you have no clue if things were said or not said.
Obviously I believe things were said when the Investigator that quit felt very strongly about the case and was shut down by his superiors.

I will say this AGAIN...the voter case is just added ammo to the BIG problem with allowing a racist hate group to place a bounty on a citizen and the DOJ not doing anything, not even giving it a comment or some half azzed investigation.
You refuse to address that issue because you have absolutely no chance in hell of defending the DOJ without looking rather stupid.

You still have not shown evidence of me "making things up"..
LMAO!




http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/crime/alton-hayes-trayvon-martin-white-man-attacked-black-racist-racism-maywood-chicago-suburb-20120420

Don't send this waste of life to jail, send him to the Aryan Brotherhood for some sensitivity training.

The liberal rhetoric following this case is going to make for as some racist rhymin revs deem it A VERY LONG HOT SUMMER.


http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

The primary difference is you guys seem to think this Black Panther issue is a national catastrophe and I don't.

I DEFINITELY do not want our President or AG worrying about an incident where NO VOTERS complained.

You also think Obama/Holder let them off the hook because they are black and the black panthers are black. You guys think they are doing them a favor because of their race.

You guys also think Zimmerman was fine to use deadly force because he got punked by a kid that he was following. For the life of me, I have no idea how you get to that conclusion.

Because, to use Murf's words, the following facts are UNDISPUTABLE:

1. Zimmerman followed Martin
2. Zimmerman was told not to follow Martin by the Cops.
3. Zimmerman ignored the cops and decided to play hero.
4. Zimmerman got out of his vehicle and pursued Martin on foot.
5. An altercation occurred AFTER Zimmerman pursued Martin.
6. Zimmerman shot Martin and killed him.
7. Martin was not armed.

Correct?

We all agree on these 7 facts?

So you would have no problem with the KKK standing outside a poling center complete with hoods and a club and saying things to black voters as they approached the building?
You would have no problem with the head of the Justice Dept. shutting down an investigation into that matter since it was only 2 klan members and nobody was assaulted, then oh well, chalk it up to a few silly klan members?

I don't believe that for a split second.
Yes, I believe they ignored because it they were black..again, imagine if some klan members were doing this as a black man was running for President..
C'mon you are better than this Bronco, I expect lunatic remarks from morons like the trooper character, but you normally have your head kind of straight.

I have not defended Zimmerman for his actions.
I have defended Zimmerman against the knee jerk reaction and the mob rules mentality and have pointed the criminal behavior of the amature news network like Ed Shultz and the liberal controlled networks that exploited the case.

As more and more information comes out about the case, it is not what the media portrayed it to be.

1. Zimmerman followed Martin ---True...not crime
2. Zimmerman was told not to follow Martin by the Cops. ---True, but that is a suggestion from an emergency response person, not a cop
3. Zimmerman ignored the cops and decided to play hero.---He continued to follow him
4. Zimmerman got out of his vehicle and pursued Martin on foot.---yes, but lost him
5. An altercation occurred AFTER Zimmerman pursued Martin. ---False according to the report, Martin attacked Zimmerman
6. Zimmerman shot Martin and killed him. --True
7. Zimmerman was not armed. --You mean Martin, but true, but to me that is a silly argument, if Mike Tyson attacked me I would shoot him to defend myself since I can't defend myself against his force. (I am not saying Martin was a Tyson type, just pointing out the silliness of that argument)

http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

Murf,

I am not convinced these guys said anything to any voters. You are.
Why? None of the voters complained.

Again, that sounds like right wing spin and hersay.

And any lawyer who has read Brandenburg v Ohio knows the KKK are permitted to speak on public property if they wanted to.

They might get their azz kicked, but they are allowed to speak under the First Amendment.

I love the difference you try to make between a 911 operator and a Cop.
Go punch a 911 operator and see what a judge says the difference is. LOL.



"Insert witty quotation here"

Murf and the Bush Administration think that was the case.

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who undertsand binary, and those who do not.

All I've been hearing is about the black panthers and associated black hate groups and what they might do. Let's look at the right wing hate groups starting with the Klan and working down thru the Skinheads, neo-nazi groups etc. I bet they are just as active and I heard one of those groups was planning an assination on Obama after he was elected in 2008 but it was sniffed out. I bet those groups will get active the closer we get to the conventions.


http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/316-20/10611-focus-right-wing-hate-groups-exploding-in-size-and-reach

I'll play Bronco..

readersupportednews???? LOL

What is a skin head, are they an organized group or a couple idiots with a blow horn?

I have not heard of anyone complaining about the neo-nazis. Was a complaint filed?

LOL, you guys are paranoid.

I don't see any parallels between the blank panthers and the Klan.

LOL, their website amateurish, therefore not a threat.

The gov should not spend their time on small fish like.......oh what....they are, never mind.



I opened up CNN this morning, their headlines was about James Cone and the racial violence in the 30's. The 30's! It was their headline. We have roving gangs of blacks in our cities racial assaulting and stealing, while CNN only wants to talk about the 30's.

Homey, I'm having trouble seeing what point you're making here.

Are the modern day Klan a vicious collection of insane crackers? No doubt. Are they largely nonconsequential these days? Yes. Did they engage in a significant amount of racial intimidation in our country's history, up to and including wholesale murder based on racial and even religious motives? Yes. Did the rule of law come down on them? Yes. That's why they are largely inconsequential in most areas of the country now.

Has there been a history of violence from black groups like the original and current Black Panthers? Yes. Has it been or is it wide spread? No. Does all of civilized America want them prosecuted and crushed by the rule of law when they engage in violence? Yes. Has the law enforcement targeted thugs who happen to be black? Yes.

Just ask the black thugs who were video-taped assaulting, robbing and violating the drunken white guy in Baltimore. Heck, go back in history. Just ask the black thugs who, in the aftermath of the Rodney King/police trial in the 1990s, pulled a white trucker out of his cab before beating and nearly killing him with a rock to the head.

All these thugs, who were no doubt black racist thugs, were socked with felonies and shamed (if they could be shamed) with media coverage.

The paranoia, fed by right-wing media, is that white America is under attack from minorities and that some sort of colloboration of "The Media" and social anarchists is enabling the attack. It's unsettling to ponder that such xenophobic victimizing was a feature that enabled Nazi Germany to grow in the 1930s.

A lot of America is under attack from criminals. A lot of them are black. In fact, a disproportionate percentage of them are black.

The very fact that prison populations are overwhelmingly high in black and hispanic inmates flys in the face of the paranoic belief a group is getting away with something because of their race or religion.

Of course you can't understand his point....

LMFAO!



Are the modern day Klan a vicious collection of insane crackers?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A very racist comment.


The paranoia, fed by right-wing media, is that white America is under attack from minorities and that some sort of colloboration of "The Media" and social anarchists is enabling the attack. It's unsettling to ponder that such xenophobic victimizing was a feature that enabled Nazi Germany to grow in the 1930s.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Only in YOUR mind is any of the above comment true.
I don't know if your that mentally challenged or you are just as pathetic as Ed Shultz with the fantasy world you live in.
But I am glad that you displayed your ignorance for everyone to get a full understanding of just how fuched up in the head you are.

Let us break down real life vs your insanity for everyone to see.

#1 You call it Paranoia if someone questions the incompetence and lack of leadership of a government office.
I don't think anyone with a brain level above a 5 year old is worried about minorities in general, let alone paranoid of any group attacking anyone.
Questioning obvious failures is the job of all TAX PAYING AMERICANS.
Fact ... BP intimidated voters, violating a Federal Law and the DOJ did nothing about it.
Fact....BP violated the civil rights of Zimmerman and committed another felony and the DOJ did nothing about it.
Fact.... By ignoring the obvious violations, the integrity of the DOJ has been damaged.
(you can deny/spin/twist everything but the facts remain)

#2 The liberal media feeds off of racial issues and when you have blatant evidence of the liberal media lying and twisting the facts to create a racial issue, people like you who have a hard time in general separating the real world from fantasy land, get confused.
Watch MSNBC for five minutes and you will see exactly what I am talking.
Fact...NBC edited transcripts to make a citizen seem racist.
Fact...MSNBC showed a blurry distant video of Zimmerman for hours during 2 days of broadcasting, knowing they were not showing the truth.

#3 This subject is not about black vs white, or the black crime rate in America, it is about the most important office in the land showing a blatant disregard for doing their job in a fair and balanced and unbiased manner.

#4 The second part about this subject is about the liberal media feeding mentally challenged people like yourself misinformation and directly lying to people to create a buzz and that buzz is starting to create a violent atmosphere.


You will not see the truth because you are part of the problem and you behave just like the pathetic liberal media.
You take bits of a conversation, twist it around to fit your agenda and then with blatant arrogance, flat out make sh!t up.
You claim the other side makes things up but when asked for evidence of this claim, the subject matter then gets twisted into something else to avoid reality.

You are a dime a dozen.





http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

Murf, you're trying to recite nursery rhymes again. Facts and rants are two separate entities.

Police investigated the Philadelphia event. That's a fact. The investigating policeman concluded no crime was being committed. That's a fact. Not a single victim came forward to say they were a victim. That's a fact.

I don't like the idea of people hanging around in fromt of public gatherings with weapons brandished and looking crazy. But in America, you can lawfully hang out in many public gatherings and look crazy with a variety of different weapons. Heck, in Arizona, you can brandish firearms.

I have to accept that racist crackers can sport a variety of weapons in a variety of venues. Just because they look crazy or even just because they look like they have criminal intent, until they break a law, they're protected.

It applies to whites, blacks, hispanics or asians. You don't like it? Leave America.

But that's where xenophobia sets in. You're so caught up in your victim wannabe fantasy world that you and your puppetmasters conjure up some sort of complex world order which is coming to get you. It's a life purpose for a victim wannabe.

Do law enforcement agencies every make mistakes? Sure. But is the DOJ in cahoots with "The Media" and social anarchists to disenfranchise the good Americans? That's the drooling, foaming at the mouth mantra of the doltish morons that fill the ranks of your brotherhood.

Is the Klan even a group anymore? LOL

Another group of 4-5 idiots with a bullhorn and a website. And you guys are going to get your panties in bunch about them too? You dudes need a reality break.

You spend all your time worrying about 2-3 idiots with NO AUDIENCE and fail to understand the real issues going on.

Last week, I heard the American Nazi Party has it first lobbyist on Capital Hill. Arguably, that is a much bigger issue than the NBPP failing to intimidate one voter, but you heard nothing out of me. Why? It doesnt fukking matter.

Small potatoes.

Get a grip. Quit being so afraid of everything Rush and the boys tell you to be afraid of. Use your brain. Think for yourself.

"Insert witty quotation here"

Anyone who takes Limbaugh seriously has to be a moron. Take a former oxycontin addict serious - you can't be serious.



http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/

I have to accept that racist crackers can sport a variety of weapons in a variety of venues.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

Another racist comment that shows everyone your intelligence level.
How do you know they are racist?

The second amendment is what separates normal thinking Americans from the whack jobs trying to destroy this country.

Would you care if 2 people from the klan dressed in their hoods, stood outside of a polling center during an election brandishing a weapon?
Would you believe that Department of Justice should press charges against the actual people there and the group that they represent?
Would you have a problem with the Klan placing a bounty on the head of a black man accused of killing a white man?
Would you have a problem with the Department of Justice ignoring this bounty?




http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

"Would you care if 2 people from the klan dressed in their hoods, stood outside of a polling center during an election brandishing a weapon?"

--Is it illegal? Were there voter complaints? I might have a problem with it, but that doesnt make it illegal.

"Would you believe that Department of Justice should press charges against the actual people there and the group that they represent?"

-- Again, is it illegal? And what group is this?

"Would you have a problem with the Klan placing a bounty on the head of a black man accused of killing a white man?"

-- Again, as far as I can tell, this isnt "illegal". If it was, the local authorities would have acted quickly.

"Would you have a problem with the Department of Justice ignoring this bounty?"

-- I hate to bust your balloon, but I dont think its "illegal" what they did. It might make me angry, but I dont know if its "illegal".





"Insert witty quotation here"

It is very illegal to place a bounty on anyone's head.
I thought you were a lawyer?

It is illegal to INTIMIDATE voters period.
It is illegal to brandish a weapon within a 1000 feet of a polling center.


So you are not bursting my bubble..lol

Stop trying to insult everyones intelligence with this sh!t.
You know what kind of firestorm would follow the klan outside a polling center.


http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

...on putting a bounty on someones head

"-- Again, as far as I can tell, this isnt "illegal". If it was, the local authorities would have acted quickly. "

...Bronco the Attorney



You seriously thought that?

No, dumbazz.

The actual language used by the person making the bounty.
It may not be illegal the way he worded it.

"Insert witty quotation here"

Murf is so slaughtered on the Philadelphia story that it's beyond debate. Yes, Murf, if the KKK set up outside a polling place with poll watching credentials and carrying bats, that would be unsettling. But, in Philadelphia, it would have been lawful.

But I'm intrigued by this allegation of a bounty from Sanford, Florida (at least I'm assuming it's from the Trayvon case).

Was this in fact a true bounty to bring in someone dead, with a reward offered? Or is this someone's phony enhancement of what was really going on?

I can see a bounty meaning different things to different people. If it was an out and out bounty to shoot, kill or hurt Zimmerman, and not something like providing evidence to convict Zimmerman, I have to question:

Where are the local authorities?
Where are the state authorities?
Who are the specific authors of the bounty?

If this was a pure "bring him in dead" challenge to BP followers, I agree, there's some criminal behaviors. I don't know the specifics of Florida State Law, but I doubt if it's written much differently than Ohio's Revised Code.

So Murf, can I see some links that spell out the particulars to this bounty in a genuine way. I'm sure the actual bounty notice must exist online somewhere. Note, that doesn't mean I want one of your puppetmasters' interpretation of the bounty.

Or is it just possible that this story is as disingenious as the Pennsylvania judge who supposedly pronounced Sharia Law (a lie) to set an admitted Muslim assaulter (another lie)free by dismissing assault charges.

Hook,

Check this out.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-3460_162-6711575.html

A Bush appointee defending Obama on this issue? WHAT????????????

"Insert witty quotation here"

Federal: Title 18 Sec 373
(a) Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct
constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted
use, or threatened use of physical force against property or
against the person of another in violation of the laws of the
United States, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of
that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to
persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be
imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment
or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of
the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime
solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life
imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty
years.

Florida: 777.04
(2) A person who solicits another to commit an offense prohibited by law and in the course of such solicitation commands, encourages, hires, or requests another person to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such offense or an attempt to commit such offense commits the offense of criminal solicitation, ranked for purposes of sentencing as provided in subsection (4).


Just in case you still need to make the connection....

Williams: I just want to say to all the listeners on this phone call, that if you are having any doubt about getting suited, booted, and armed up for this race war that were in that has never ended, let me tell you somethin; the thing thats about to happen these honkies, these crackers, these pigs, these people, these motherfuckers; it has been long overdue. I say to everyone that is on this call right now; Im comin out of the gate; my prize right now this evening is going to be the bounty, the arrest dead or alive for George Zimmerman. You feel me? To every brother, to every female, I am for violence if non-violence means we continue postponing a solution to the American black mans problem just to avoid violence. You feel me? Its time to wake up I dont know how else; its in me to fight. Its in me to raise up soldiers. Its in me that every time my feet touch the ground the state of Florida these crackers- they scared.

Im kinda pissed off right now that the state of Florida aint on fire. This could not have happened in L.A. because them brothers up there are not scared to riot. This could not have happened in St. Petersburg Florida, where the black man over there aint scared to kill a cracker."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Whoever intimidates, threatens, coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, at any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing such candidate, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."


Standing about 50 feet from the door of a polling center dressed in some type of military gear holding a weapon would be called INTIMIDATION by 99.9% of the normal thinking population.
There is nothing else to talk about if you are the DOJ...clear visual evidence of a member of a racist hate group standing outside a polling center.

As I have stated before:
The DOJ has ignored two very serious crimes committed by a racist hate group.

Now, a part time country cop and a lawyer should find both of these charges to be serious in nature, but you are both willing to ignore the incompetence or the blatant arrogance of the DOJ, to try and save face for some odd reason.

The Bounty case is a more serious issue.
How the leaders of that party and this Williams disaster are not in jail waiting for a trial is an embarrassment to law enforcement.



Now you have the laws..you have the evidence.
What is the problem?




http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

http://www2.wkrg.com/news/2012/apr/23/man-beaten-mob-critical-condition-ar-3659891/

This is the type of behavior you get when the liberal media exploits a case.
This about the 3rd or 4th story in the past week where an innocent white man is attacked and the cowards that attacked him claim it was justice for Trayvon.

Twitter blew up with death threats against Zimmerman and the judge that did his job.

Holder is kissing Al Sharptons azz at an event while all of this is going on.



http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

Ohmygosh, Murf. You actually disgrace your moron brotherhood.

I didn't decide, and Bronco didn't decide, to not prosecute the Philadelphia jokers. The investigating law enforcement officials at the local, state and federal levels, from both parties, concluded there was no crime. Their decisions weren't particularly difficult to understand, as long as you don't wrap yourself up in your cloak of self pity victimization.

It's not against the law to wear camoglauge. It's not against the law in Philadelphia to walk around with billy clubs. That's true if you're a black lunatic with poll-watching credentials or if you're one of those white victim wannabes that flock to gun shows and get themselves off with self pitying victimization rants.

And in America, which you apparently hate, you get ample first ammendment protection to express yourself with inflammatory speech. If you just make a token attempt to speak in code and only infer general violence, you get protected. That's why Ted Nugent isn't sitting in jail right now.

That radio interview transcript you posted (assuming you didn't make all or part of it up) was definately inflammatory. So is the rhetoric from the right wing militia types that incite the cracker victim wannabes.

The reason I brought the Voter intimidation case was to show the hypocrisy of the left. As you will note, I agreed with bronco that there was likely not enough evidence to convict them in Philadelphia case. But, I did not bring it up to debate whether a crime occurred, but rather to show that the left will defend these actions, but get enraged if a conservative suggests you should need ID at a voting booth.

The argument is that IDs will be used to keep the poor and unorganized from voting. yet, this Black panther stuff, is acceptable merely because it is not illegal. Never-mind that is very hard to prosecute these crimes, and there was huge political element to the case. The party that so enamored with voter rights bends over backwards to defend the panthers. Seems to me they do with panthers exactly what they accuse the conservatives of doing with Zimmerman.

I do not hate liberals. I think viewpoint diversity is important. I have changed my opinions on issues based on the well-reasoned arguments of liberals. I think they are good people. There is one thing that bothers me-liberals think they are intellectually superior and conservatives are a bunch of Creationist hicks that get their guidance from Rush Limbaugh. Let me tell you, you hear in TV, radio, politics and message the loudest of the party, who are unfortunately most of those things.

However, the majority, the reasonable element of the party because of their conservative nature plays second fiddle to the loudmouths. Reagan could not get the nomination in today's republican party. True conservatives (low taxes, low spending, personal freedom, smaller government, HELPING OTHERS) need to take back the party from the religious right.

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who undertsand binary, and those who do not.

Trooper, you are too stupid to insult.
You talk in circles so much that you can't even win argument with yourself.


You wanted the law...I provided the actual text of the law that clearly spells out that is ILLEGAL to INTIMIDATE voters.
You wanted the law...I provided the actual text of the law that clearly defines the criminal nature of a bounty.
You wanted the wording from the people that authored the bounty...I provided the actual text of the loud mouth moron word for word that clearly spells out an intent (of course, you question if it is real or not b/c it does not fit your agenda)
You wanted evidence of intimidation...it is all over youtube..


So you come back on here and you still, try to claim there is nothing to either of these very racial issues.
Everyone understands that there was a lack of action on the part of the authorities...that is the entire complaint!!!!!
Nobody disputes the right to wear some k-mart military gear.
Nobody disputes the freedom of speech even if it is hate speech.
But there is a law to prohibits intimidation of voters.
I don't know how in the world anyone on this planet can't see how the Panthers actions outside of a polling center brandishing a weapon and making racist comments can't be deemed INTIMIDATION.
Of course nobody came forward, THEY WERE INTIMIDATED...

The Bounty case is beyond alarming.
How anyone can dismiss this as something petty is beyond insane.







http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

bronco, you are a one trick pony. You got the beat-down for using Media Matters as a source in another thread, yet you go back to that poisoned well again with a story from CBS which quotes a Media Matters investigation.

For everyone's information, Media Matters is a partisan organization whose founder, David Brock, is also running a pro-Obama super PAC.

Give it a rest. Your credibility is wearing a bit thin lately. Your cheering section is down to Trooper and that is about it....

No, Murf. Much like the little child who never quite understands what the adults are saying around him, you're not telling the truth when you say that I see nothing wrong with the actions of the Black Panther members in Philadelphia or Florida.

I flat out think it's unsettling, crazy and even despiscable. Just like I think Ted Nugent's comments were unsettling....and even incitefully in concert with treasonous rhetoric.

But we are a country of laws. You can look crazy. You can dress crazy. You can carry an assortment of weapons in a wide variety of venues. I might not like it. You might not like it. But you can do and say a lot of crazy stuff, including making a lot of violent,but carefully-worded inferences, and still not be against the law.

If that Philadelphia officer would have heard the lawfully-present BP poll worker say something like: I'll bash the heads of anyone voting republican or who I think might consider voting republican, I'm confident that an arrest would have been made. Of course I can't prove it, because it didn't happen.

If Ted Nugent would have absolutely said: If Obama gets elected president again, I'll die or be arrested trying to kill him, I'm confident that Nugent would have been arrested. Of course I can't prove it, because it didn't happen.

Those BP's and Nugent acted like morons. And they certainly imply a lot of violent intent. But neither got arrested or prosecuted for much the same reason.

But a victim wannabe will not, or perhaps can not, see the big picture.

Why didnt the cops arrest either of the Black Panther guys at the time of the incident?

Like Murf pointed out, they didnt arrest them under state law?

Why havent they arrested them under state law? Its only been 3.5 years? Sounds like the local and state government agree as well. Sounds like the local cops, proescutors and AG's office agrees with the DOJ as well.

Hmmm. It is strange that all of these entities tend to agree.

And USC3, read the CBS link, it contains facts and proper sources. Unlike most of the right wing garbage you guys cite to.



"Insert witty quotation here"

These are delicate issues we are discussing and I am leary aboout saying too much about these hate groups either black or white. This board is on the world wide web and you don't know who is looking at this. I posted something the other night about white hate groups but thought better of it and pulled it. These groups are dangerous in my opinion especially in these volatile times and I wouldn't want a molatov cocktail in my living room at 3:00 in the morning. I lived through the 60's and know what can happen.

preach on bengalbear

The point I am trying to make is similar to Draw, there is a big disparity on how the two groups are treated. Like Troop said, its hard to prove if it didn't happen and if the KKK did what the BP did, we would see a different outcome.

This next election, if the KKK pull the stunt the BP did, mark my words, two things will happen..
1) Justice Dept will file charges
2) Bronco will agree with the charges and insist there are no parallels between the two cases.

Same set of facts? No, I wouldn't actually.

For the record, I think the KKK is a worthless group as well. Bunch of idiots. They actually used to matter. They numbered in the MILLIONS. They have a consistent history of oppression, prejudice and violence.

The Black Panthers? LOL

A group whose membership consisted of, at their height, maybe 5-10 thousand or so in the late 60's? Both of these groups are idiotic and non-factors in life.

For the life of me, I still cannot phathom why you guys are so fired up over two guys at a polling station whose activities failed to elicit one voter complaint.

In my line of work, where are the damages?
Small potatoes. Actually no potatoes. You guys seriously want the DOJ spending millions on prosecuting these two idiots at a single polling place?

Your best argument? If two guys in KKK hoods had done the same, it would be a different story. Cant we just agree both groups are moronic and idiotic and non-factors in our lives?

Do you guys live in fear of the black panther party? Jesus, if that is the case, you are pathetic.

I have never defended the Black Panther party in my life. And I likely never will (other than to say they are allotted their freedom of speech like the rest of us).



"Insert witty quotation here"

For the love of all things holy..

FUCH THE VOTER INTIMIDATION CASE..it never happend. (lol)
There is not a single law on the books that can protect people from being intimidated in Philly.

Time to move past that...
Now please explain the Bounty case.
Very clear wording in the law and very clear text about the intent.
No excuse can be made as to why not a single department from local to State to Federal has even commented on the case, let alone press federal charges against the group and the individuals involved.

Now on to the claim of MILLIONS of people were part of the Klan at one time?
When was this?
I am sure in the 60's they might have had a huge following in the south, but I doubt if they reached anywhere close to the number in the millions.
I could be wrong just seems to me as a very exaggerated number.

On a side not:
If I was in charge of getting Obama back in office, I would be calling every liberal whack job that has a radio or tv gig and tell them to stop the racial exploitation.
The Race card was going to be the trump card but now it seems that many people are starting to question the integrity of the President and his appointed friend Mr. Holder because of the several racial issues he has had while in office.




http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2012/05/beating-church-and-brambleton

Still waiting on Obama and Holder to make any type of comment what so ever on the continued attacks of innocent white people by gangs of out of control blacks.

I guess Ed Shultz and the rest of the useless liberal media can't find the time to discuss this on going problem either.



http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/

We are being South Africa'ed and the guilty whites will just keep seeking atonement.

I am not shocked at the lack of concern from the liberals.

Can you imagine the false outrage if gangs of white people were randomly running around attacking innocent black people and calling them racist names?




http://murf-seriously.blogspot.com/