Stuff here

>Oh, you might be surprised. I could give examples, >but I'd rather not drag old issues up here. Suffice >it to say that if one person has a much higher >opinion of his or her work than the rest of the >people actually doing the nominating, they can throw >quite a tantrum over it.

I realize people would get mad over something like that. I meant... if a person who gets mad because they didn't win a contest over the internet.. that's a pretty immature attitude. You probably realize that though.

>And you'll be seeing what-all it involves close-up. >Heh, there's probably a good reason none of last >year's URA committee volunteered for this year! Can't >say I blame them.

Well, we can vote for the people next year, correct? To clarify, if someone won a category last year... and is 'disqualified' from that category this year because of such... we can still vote for them next year? That's they way I understand it. I still don't 100% agree - but the world doesn't revolve around me..

It's not a bad idea to try out, though.

Tora