Image by FlamingText.com
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Board Front Page  

Next Years team...

December 10 2001 at 9:27 PM
  (Login VolfanJB)
from IP address 24.250.77.157

 
I think that we will be better next year on offense.
We better be. Because, in my humble opinion, If John Chavis is still here we will still be a mediocre defense at best. It's time to pat Chavey on the back, thank him for "a job well done", then send him on his way and bring in Woody.
Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
GRAY
(Login GrayZen)
209.246.99.140

FLUKEmer is familiar with Woody

December 10 2001, 9:35 PM 

Just ask Jamie Whitted.

 
 
poltn
(Login poltn)
168.191.249.176

QB Recruiting

December 10 2001, 10:24 PM 

TN had better recruit a QB this year. Yeah, Casey may have "awesome" stats but let's get real. If not for the WR there would be no stats. Any QB can throw 5 yard passes and in the flats. Any yardage gained is purely WR talent after the catch. They even poked fun at him on national TV. If you remember Casey,s Brother at LSU was told to play the part of Casey during practices but said that would be tough because he couldn't throw that slow and wobbly.

 
 

(Login TheMOUTHPIECE)
152.163.197.71

JB..

December 12 2001, 10:42 PM 

"I think that we will be better next year on offense."

Probably just as inconsistent, with Colonel Sanders calling a good game one week a shitty one the next. Weary and Coleman will not be easy to replace.

"We better be. Because, in my humble opinion, If John Chavis is still here we will still be a mediocre defense at best."

DL takes a huge hit, LBers will be slightly improved at best, secondary will still suck & still not know how to catch a ball that hits them in the numbers.

"It's time to pat Chavey on the back, thank him for "a job well done", then send him on his way and bring in Woody.
Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth."

It's time for Chavis to go point blank.



    
This message has been edited by TheMOUTHPIECE from IP address 152.163.197.71 on Dec 12, 2001 11:21 PM


 
 
WorstedOne
(Login WorstedOne)
216.111.22.83

Poltn

December 13 2001, 9:47 AM 

You must have been watching a different team/QB than what I saw. During the last two thirds of this season, Clausen completed numerous clutch 3rd and 4th down passes over the middle. Replays often revealed the pinpoint accuracy that was required to thread the ball through the outstretched hands of defenders. In addition, the guy proved himself to be a leader. He's the kind of guy who wants his number called in a clutch situation.

He's not fast and not the most graceful QB you'll ever see. He gets the job done. That remark from his little bro. started b/f the first LSU game. His 180 lb. little bro. probably ought to spend more time focusing on his own skills b/c based on what I saw this past Saturday, it appears his biggest contribution to LSU football will be imitating his older brother.

 
 

(Login Bark_Simpson)
63.10.36.119

Re: Clausen...

December 13 2001, 1:10 PM 

I was pretty impressed by Clausen in 2001. Frankly, he was better than I thought he would be. I will admit naming him pre-season All-SEC was a bit much, IMO.

IN 2002 there will be some really good QB's in the SEC:

Clausen @ Tenn

Grossman @ UF

Green @ UGA (IMO, the most impressive)

Manning @ UManning (Fant showed him up in the Egg Bowl)

Fant @ MSU (Came on strong in the Egg Bowl win & BYU loss...both end-of-the-season games.)

Lorenzen @ UK

Watts @ Bama

Campbell @ Auburn

...A couple I'm leaving out.

Hand it to Clausen on this level: He was able to beat Tenn's biggest rival (ie, UF.) IMO, that's a big measuring stick for a QB...especially in the SEC.

Green @ UGA beat his rival...

Fant @ MSU beat his rival...

Clausen @ Tenn beat his rival...

Petty @ USC beat his rival...

etc.

 
 
Phil
(Login Philadelphia)
152.163.197.62

If Flukener doesn't make staff changes UT

December 13 2001, 2:26 PM 

will underachieve again with a tougher schedule.


 
 
Justin
(Login Justin1)
205.188.195.36

Re: Next Years team...

December 13 2001, 2:36 PM 

Guys, in my opinion, UT's defense will be in trouble next year if Haynesworth leaves early (which would be stupid by the way). That would mean UT would have to replace its entire line. On another note, I don't see Stallworth leaving. He's prone to injury and hasn't been consistently productive in big games.

I'm not worried about DE as much as I'm concerned over DT. IF AH leaves, that leaves TN with only Rashad Moore and Aubrayo Franklin at DT. Ed Kendrick could come back. To make matters worse, UT will have to replace most of its dline after 2002 (Ritzmann, Veal, Franklin, Hand, Kendrick and Moore are gone then). I think the LBs will be a lot better next year, but the secondary is still shaky.

IF Brocky is wrong about Woody and we're forced to suffer with Chavis again next year, it could get bad on defense.

With that said, I think Tennessee's offense next year will be its most talented since the 1990 team.

 
 

(Login megalodon)
216.111.19.144

Justin

December 13 2001, 3:25 PM 

I heard on the radio talk show that chavis turned down the offer and will be back at UT next year. Doesn't sound to good,huh?

 
 
DOUBLEWIDE
(Login DOUBLEWIDE)
24.159.181.83

RB'S TO LB

December 14 2001, 6:24 AM 

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE LINEBACKER SPOT. UT WILL HAVE PLENTY HS ALL AMERICAN RB'S ON THE ROSTER TO MOVE TO LB. IF UT WANTS A LB WHY NOT RECRUIT A LB?
A CLASSIC MOVE BY THE COACHING STAFF.

DOUBLEWIDE

 
 
Current Topic - Next Years team...  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Board Front Page  
Find more forums on GeneralCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2010 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

Sports Parlor South Has Moved!!! Click Here to go to the SPSIC Main Page and Link to the NEW Message Board.