A pretty good look at the Citrus Bowl from a U of M sportswriter.
http://www.mlive.com/wolverines/football/
This season, how eager is either team to be in this game? Both missed out on loftier goals. Each entered its final regular-season game with a chance to be the champion (or co-champion) of its conference. Each lost and settled for a bowl bid that is not nearly what it had in mind. U-M would have been playing in the Sugar Bowl had it not lost to Ohio State. Tennessee had even more at stake: It would have been playing Miami (Florida) in the Rose Bowl for the national title had it not lost Saturday to Louisiana State...
...All that said, there is a good reason to like U-M's chances in this game: Attitude. When it comes to bowl games, U-M is all business. The Wolverines are disappointed with their performance in the loss to Ohio State, but they know they can soothe some of those feelings with a win in this game. Expect the Wolverines to deliver a maximum effort on New Year's Day.
On the flip side, one Knoxville (Tenn.) sports columnist pointed out Monday that in recent years, the Volunteers have taken bowl games lightly if there is not a lot at stake. Coach Phil Fulmer's 5-4 bowl record, including losses in three of the last four postseason games, has raised questions about preparation, practice, scheduling and motivation for non-championship bowl games. Tennessee's only win in that time gave them the national title following the 1998 season.
...Fulmer promised Sunday that his team will approach this game with all the seriousness of every game it plays. He added that his players better be excited or "we'll get the pants beat off of us."
He later said: "If you aren't going to play in the Rose Bowl, this is about as good as it gets."
The question is: Does anyone besides Citrus Bowl officials believe him?