You are welcome as a guest, and as long as you do not abuse that hospitality, your views and comments will be respected.

............ [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ............

   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.............

 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  

Thames Valley speed cameras may not save lives but they do improve the environment

October 15 2003 at 11:21 PM
funkiiprez  (Login funkiiprez)
from IP address 195.93.34.7

 
In 1997, Dft figures show that the Thames Valley police force area recorded 150 fatal accidents and 959 serious injuries on its roads.

After taking part in the original pilot, Thames Valley Police formed a safety camera partnership in April 2000** and joined the Safety Camera Funding Scheme.

The area now has over 300 speed cameras (and rising) plus mobile units.

At the beginning of 2003, the year-ending 2002 RTA statistics were released for the Thames Valley area by the DfT. There were 157 fatalities and 1379 serious injuries.

A few months later, quarterly results were released for the 12 month period to March 2003 (again by the DfT). The statistics for fatalities and serious injuries had been combined to give a new 'KSI' figure ('killed or seriously injured') and the figure was 1677.

So, in summary - in their own (new) terms:

1997 - KSI = 1129
2002 - KSI = 1536
3/2002 to 3/2003 - KSI = 1677

Here is an extract from a press release (dated 12th Feb 2003) from the Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership:

Following a meeting of the Partnership’s project board today (Wednesday 12th Feb 2003 Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership have made the following response to the Department of Transport’s report on speed cameras:-

“We welcome the report and whilst we are concerned about the overall casualty levels we must not lose sight of the fact that we entered the pilot project with a history of almost 10 years use of camera enforcement which had already resulted in significant reductions in Death and Serious Injury.

Our own figures show that we are continuing to affect the most serious road crashes especially at our targeted sites. We are also having a much wider effect on traffic speeds which not only affects casualty reduction but also improves the environment for our communities. We regret the fact that the report fails to fully recognise our previous contribution and that the base line for the study was set after those reductions had occured.

Our original strategy was to make much better use of our existing infrastructure. Having achieved that, we recognise the need to spread the deterrent effect beyond the fixed camera sites. We now focus much more on mobile enforcement at specific sites and on routes which have high collision rates. We will continue to work with the Department for Transport to review our future activities as we are acutely aware that we cannot afford to stand still when it comes to saving lives on our roads. We welcome suggestions for improvement and consider the DfT report as an opportunity to do even better.

The reality is that speed cameras continue to protect residents and road users in Thames Valley and are in great demand by our communities. We are committed to reducing speeding and road crashes, concentrating, in the first place, on reducing the severity of injuries."

Ian Duncan
Buckinghamshire County Council


(Full press release at: http://www.saferroads.org/DisplayPage.asp?pageid=18 )

Now, I've got the message - when will they d'you think??





**with Oxfordshire County Council, Buckinghamshire County Council, Milton Keynes Council, Slough Borough Council, Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead, Bracknell Forest Borough Council, Wokingham District Council, Reading Borough Council, West Berkshire Council, Thames Valley Magistrates Courts Services, Crown Prosecution Service and The Highways Agency

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.79.15.124

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

October 15 2003, 11:45 PM 

For those that don't know: funki used to be pro speed camera.

Welcome to the dark side, funki ! ; - )

 

> "Now, I've got the message - when will they d'you think??"

When their jobs no longer depend on defending their message!

 


 
 
Current Topic - Thames Valley speed cameras may not save lives but they do improve the environment  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page............................. !!gg* .......................... !! * .....................


Visitors are requested to keep their posts "legal, decent and honest" and comply with the normal rules of society and web netiquette. Visitors are fully responsible for their own posts and any consequences thereof. However, whilst accepting no responsibility for same, I reserve the right to remove any posts I happen to come across that I feel might be "dubious". The contents of any posts, or websites linked from any posts or any pages on this or related websites do not neccesarily reflect the views or opinions of the forum owner. All copyrights, trademarks, etc, acknowledged