You are welcome as a guest, and as long as you do not abuse that hospitality, your views and comments will be respected.

............ [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ............

   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.............

 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  

Those lying Greens (again)

February 9 2004 at 1:54 PM
Andy  (no login)
from IP address 81.98.85.233

During the summer the Association of London Government, along with TfL, produced an advertisement to publicise its vehicle emissions testing initiative. The ad showed a drawing of a group of vehicles with cigarettes instead of exhaust pipes accompanied by the slogan "Smoking Kills".
It claimed: "24,000 people in the UK die every year due to breathing in polluted air", then mentioning emissions testing as if it were a solution to the supposed problem. The ad clearly implied that vehicle pollution kills 24,000 people per year.
The claim originates in a misreading of a report by the Government Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollution (COMEAP) some years ago.
However, the pollutants implicated in the report were mainly industrial - what transport content there is emanates mainly from the elderly diesel engines of buses and HGV's. Naturally the report pointed out that correlation did not imply causation; it could be that social or meteorological factors that cause some days to have higher pollutant levels than others also cause stress to the terminally ill. The conclusion was that there was no proof that pollution caused any premature deaths at all, but that it might, in a worst case, cause up to 24,000 terminally ill people per year to die up to two weeks prematurely.
Very different from the "24,000 people a year struck down in their prime by car fumes" claimed by the green lobby!
Anyone glimpsing the ad might simply assume that it was a public information poster warning of the dangers of car pollution. In other words, Ken Livingstone was using taxpayers' money to produce misleading propaganda for his anti-car crusade.
I reported this to the ASA, and it upheld my complaint. They have agreed that the advert misleadingly implied that 24,000 a year die from vehicle pollution. They also agreed that the statement "24,000 a year die from air pollution" could not be backed up and told the advertiser not to repeat it. The Ass'n of London Government tried to use the COMEAP report to support their claim, but the ASA were quite clear that it didn't say what they claimed it said.

Andrew Bent, writing in 'On the Road'.

Guilty on all counts, M'Lud.

 

 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Those lying Greens (again)  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page............................. !!gg* .......................... !! * .....................


Visitors are requested to keep their posts "legal, decent and honest" and comply with the normal rules of society and web netiquette. Visitors are fully responsible for their own posts and any consequences thereof. However, whilst accepting no responsibility for same, I reserve the right to remove any posts I happen to come across that I feel might be "dubious". The contents of any posts, or websites linked from any posts or any pages on this or related websites do not neccesarily reflect the views or opinions of the forum owner. All copyrights, trademarks, etc, acknowledged