Well, it looks like I'm banned by the Beeb again: for either complaining about posts that breach the BBC House Rules, or defending myself against posts which breach House Rules but they refuse to remove, or complaining about them removing posts where I am defending myself.................
Or maybe some combination of the above.
So I can't post this, though for once the post I am replying to has also been removed.
The thread is:
George alleged:
re: Trams a success. George Painter - 310th post - 20 Apr 2004 15:29
If you really want to see some sad "debate" then search on "It's your duty Bogush" - that's if Bogush will let you in - he bans people he doesn't like (most of the population).
---------------------
I replied:
re: Trams a success. bogush j mann - 1473rd post - 20 Apr 2004 20:50
As you are very well aware, George, I have never banned anyone from my board.
However, as you are also aware, due to spam attacks of hundreds of thousands of words of cut and paste from a certain other forum via them, I've had to block access through certain servers.
And as you are also well aware, anyone who had been using those servers who wants to post through another ISP is free to do so.
----------------------------------------------------
George responded:
re: Trams a success. George Painter - 315th post - 20 Apr 2004 21:45
So I'm not banned just have my access blocked, as does everyone with access to a Notts County Council machine?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I replied:
re: Trams a success. bogush j mann - 1474th post - 20 Apr 2004 22:01
You don't mean to say that my taxes are being used to launch spam attacks against me?
And I thought you didn't work for the council George!?!
-------------------------------------------------------------------
George retorted:
re: Trams a success. George Painter - 313th post - 21 Apr 2004 10:24
"And I thought you didn't work for the council George!?!"
Jumping to conclusions again Bogush - or are you once again twisting peoples postings?
I actually said "as does everyone with access to a Notts County Council machine?" Where does that say that I work for them or indeed work at all?
And:
re: Trams a success. George Painter - 314th post - 21 Apr 2004 10:34
"You don't mean to say that my taxes are being used to launch spam attacks against me?"
No I don't Bogush and if you're making an accusation then please do so directly. And expect the consequences.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, I hope Ol' Jolly is paying attention:
You will note, that whilst I might have cut and pasted a lot of quotes, I have edited out all the duplication and repetition made superfluous by my juxtapostion of the quotes. So, whilst this post is quite long, it is a fraction of the length of your attempts to duplicate my style in a vain attempt to mock it.
------------------------
George, pay attention, as I "rewrite" the above (or, as you would like to claim: "twist it" ) :
I quite clearly state that I blocked posts from servers from which spam attacks emanated.
You quite clearly responded that Notts County Council "machines" were blocked.
I quite clearly responded "You don't mean to say that my taxes are being used to launch spam attacks against me?"
Which, if they were Council "machines", my taxes were being used to launch spam attacks against me.
And I also said:
And I thought you didn't work for the council George!?!
Which I did originally, but you'd convinced me you don't.
You then started posting:
"Jumping to conclusions again Bogush - or are you once again twisting peoples postings?"
"I actually said "as does everyone with access to a Notts County Council machine?"
"Where does that say that I work for them or indeed work at all?"
And:
"No I don't Bogush and if you're making an accusation then please do so directly. And expect the consequences."
Is there anything you would like to add to that?