You are welcome as a guest, and as long as you do not abuse that hospitality, your views and comments will be respected.

............ [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ............

   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.............

 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  

More 'Proof' that.....SPEED CAMERAS DON'T SAVE LIVES....

July 21 2004 at 8:48 PM
Anonymous  (no login)
from IP address 62.255.0.8

 
....‘Sad truth is that in terms of deaths on the road the cameras are proving ineffective’

By JAMIE McGINNES

THE NUMBER of people killed at road black-spots in Kent has barely changed since the introduction of speed cameras, Kent on Sunday can reveal.
..Camera managers in the county admit they are disappointed by the poor results, while a senior county MP said the devices didn’t work and called for more traffic police.
..In a progress report to the county council this week the Kent and Medway Safety Camera Partnership revealed 118 people were killed or seriously injured in 19 months at 96 of its 124 camera sites.
..This compares with an average of 162 deaths and serious injuries per year before the partnership was set up in 2002 – a fall of 54 per cent, it said.
..But closer scrutiny of the figures by KoS showed that while there were fewer minor accidents, the number of road deaths near speed cameras had hardly changed. There were 12 road deaths at camera sites in the 19 months after the partnership took over running the county’s traps – compared with 33 in the previous three years.
..Chris Rogers, project manager for the partnership, agreed the figures were disappointing. “I cannot deny that,” he said.
..“The number of fatalities across the county is staying fairly stubborn and not going down as much as other serious accidents at camera sites. It’s not as encouraging as we would like. We will hope in time that this turns out to be just a blip.”
..Three children and seven pedestrians died on Kent and Medway’s roads in the
19-month period – July 2002 to February 2004 – compared with three children and 10 pedestrians for the entire three years beforehand.
..Meanwhile, overall road death statistics for Kent and Medway reveal little is different for the last three years. Figures from Kent Police show that 103 people were killed on the county’s roads last year, compared with 112 the year before and 107 in 2001.
..And Mr Rogers said that the number of motorcyclists dying in road accidents in Kent was actually rising.
..Damian Green, MP for Ashford and the Conservatives’ transport spokesman, said the figures showed speed cameras didn’t work and the UK’s entire road safety system should be revised.
..“The Kent figures reflect the national trend, where actually road deaths have started increasing slightly after years of steady decline. The sad truth is that in terms of deaths on the road the cameras are proving ineffective.
..“What we need to do is to have a much more all-embracing approach that takes in junction design and use of active traffic policing against the most dangerous drivers.
..“Over-reliance on speed cameras actually means we are in danger of taking our eye off the ball. We have got an unbalanced system.”

..Nationally, the number of road deaths rose last year from 3,431 in 2002 to 3,508, according to a report published last month by the Department for Transport.

From:
http://www.kentonsunday.co.uk/news/news.asp


How long before they finally admit they've got it wrong?



 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Sums Up Fast!
(no login)
81.101.65.132

Re: More 'Proof' that.....SPEED CAMERAS DON'T SAVE LIVES....

July 22 2004, 12:04 AM 

Road between Dover and Deal hhas 50 mph speed limit and 4 scameras along a 15 minute stretch at 50 mph - so that shows how close together these are.

The road is not residential at these scam sites - but do have side junctions leading to St Margaret's Bay and admittedly there are some bends which you simply would not and should not contemplate at 30 mph let alone 50 mph! And the scams are nowhere near these bends! They are on the straight bit!

What a surprise!

No wonder they are not working! Bet you they have placed scams on road because accidents have occurred at these bends. Only ... at fleece spot and nowhere near black spot!

No wonder the roads have still got high death toll!

 
 
Current Topic - More 'Proof' that.....SPEED CAMERAS DON'T SAVE LIVES....  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page............................. !!gg* .......................... !! * .....................


Visitors are requested to keep their posts "legal, decent and honest" and comply with the normal rules of society and web netiquette. Visitors are fully responsible for their own posts and any consequences thereof. However, whilst accepting no responsibility for same, I reserve the right to remove any posts I happen to come across that I feel might be "dubious". The contents of any posts, or websites linked from any posts or any pages on this or related websites do not neccesarily reflect the views or opinions of the forum owner. All copyrights, trademarks, etc, acknowledged