| What Kind Of Justice, Logic, Reason Even Would You Expect From A PissedUp Head?December 5 2004 at 5:32 PM | bogush (Login bogush)
Forum Owner
from IP address 81.77.82.168 |
| -
|
|
|
diesel ed
499 posts
2 months |
16:41
PetrolTed said:
|
As someone else said on that thread, it would have been better to email me |
But then went on to say -
PetrolTed said:
|
By the way, had you sent me a long diatribe via email, I'd suggest the same solution so pleae don't bother sending me one now. |
PetrolTed said:
|
as not surprisingly I don't read every single thread on these forums. |
Or even every post on the threads you do read or you would not be posting -
PetrolTed said:
|
To be honest your constant whingeing is enough to ask you to leave. |
If you'd actually read the threads, as politely repeatedly requested, you might have spotted that my "constant whingeing" was, after extreme constant provocation, finally in fact responding in kind to others "constant whingeing" that every time they come onto one of my threads they find them boring and so don't read them
But have to relieve their boredom by reducing what I had hoped would be a sensible discussion into farce.
PetrolTed said:
|
Everyone else manages to integrate well enough, I've no idea why you can't. |
Again, if you'd read the threads, or even my "constant whingeing", you could have answered that yourself. In fact, all you had to do was read the the parts of the threads that contained posts from people sticking up for me. But instead, you choose to side with the people attacking me without bothering to look at both sides of the story.
PetrolTed said:
|
If you can't work out what it takes then may I suggest you just find somewhere else to air your views. |
I can work out what it takes - soundbites, in your face piss taking on nothing in particular, and keeping off the heavy stuff. It cartainly worked when I was using soundbites, in your face piss taking on nothing in particular, and keeping off the heavy stuff.
Oh, and never disagreeing with certain people.
Especially when they respond to your reasoned disagreement with things like -
towman said:
|
Would you mind speaking in English please. I don`t understand fluent bollox.
What has the rubbish you have posted got to do with the fact that at 11pm there is a definate hazard from pedestrians who are the worse for wear.
Oh yes - no-one "deserves a funeral" for stepping into the road. The driver was going to fast. Is that too difficult a concept for you? Whatever you consider a reasonable speed, the posted limit was 30mph. End of argument. |
And -
towman said:
|
Sir, you really are one of the most offensive dweebs I have ever had the misfortune to "meet". Actually, you are the first and second most offensive....etc etc. But thats another story.
Are you sponsored by Euthenasia R Us? You are the best advert for the "assisting" of demented old fools that I can think of.
Go on then, start another load of bolox about "personal attacks" and "insults" etc. I really couldn`t give a sh*t. |
And -
towman said:
|
diesel ed said:
|
Run out of arguments then? Feel free to be as insulting as you like.Ok - You`re a wank*r Sticks and stones may "Brake" my bones, but words will never harm me. And personal attacks certainly won't undermine my argument. Ok - You`re STILL a wank*r......... |
|
Did someone mention "misquoting".
Again?
If you really want to know what is happening, and I suppose it's not surprising in the dumbed down PC society we live in, (and as Towman himself admitted) people come "here", including the Speed, Plod & the Law Forum, for light entertainment, not education (OK, the "quote" was "homework").
And despite what people, including yourself, claim, people aren't "integrated", and I am not "preaching to the choir/converted".
If you had bothered to read the threads (including the ones I don't post on) you would have spotted that I generally only post on threads where there are pro-motoring views, and opposing views which undermine the pro-motoring position, which I attempt to show are undermining the pro-motoring position.
Unfortunately, by definition, this is going to "show up" those motorists who hold those views. And we all know you should never criticise a motorists about their motoring.
We also know there are people who get bored too easily with their schoolwork, and, instead of just playing truant, or siting quietly at the back, insist on coming into school spraying graffiti everywhere, doodling on everyone's work, taking the p!ss out of teacher, and generally trying to disrupt the class for their own amusement.
Teacher, though s/he may be expelled for eventually losing it and daring to "talk in an inappropriate tone of voice" to the little angels they are trying to enlighten, isn't in the wrong, and certainly shouldn't be trying to "integrate well enough" with them.
If you had bothered to read the threads (and the threads started to get away from the graffiti covered threads which were themselves stated to escape from the ones that were doodled all over) you would have noticed the pattern.
But, just as you haven't a clue what I have posted here, because it is sooooooo long and toooooo boring to read, you'll never know what happened in those other threads.
But, if you think that banning someone on the basis of allegations, rather than a fair trail is reasonable and just, feel free.
After all, it's not as if that will give any lurkers from Brake/ T2000/ Reclaim The Streets/ government?.... the impression that motorists find my views so unacceptable that they have to bury them in b*ll*x, (and purleeeeeze don't start with the "preaching to the converted line" - I've just covered that!) or that they believe in punishment without trial for infringing arbitrary (and unclear) edicts.
Is it? |
|
PetrolTed
17875 posts
71 months |
16:47
Whatever.
Whether your views are pro-motorist or not isn't he issue. It's the fact that wherever you appear descends into chaos.
Why you persevere here I've no idea.
I wish you farewell and better luck on other sites that are more understanding.
|
|
From:
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=141359&f=141&h=0
So that's the kind of "justice" motorists want:
It doesn't matter if you're safe - you were speeding!
And that's the kind of society they want:
It doesn't matter if you're right - everyone refuses to read your posts but reserves the right to fill your threads with inappropriate "responses" and other "contributions!
|
| | Author | Reply | bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.82.168 | I Particularly Like: | December 5 2004, 5:40 PM |
ace-T said:
|
You may not agree with Towman but he has taken the time to consider his argument and write it in a coherent and reasoned manner, please respect that or move on.
Ace-T |
From:
Hypocricy? You Gotta Larf
I wonder if Towman's been banned then?
And then the next day she posts:
|
ace-T
1084 posts
23 months |
Yesterday (18:30)
Need the PH collectives help to humiliate a complete p k who thinks it is funny to buy a vibrator in the work Secret Santa thing, for the single purpose of humiliating me in front of all my work collegues. I overheard him saying, bring a camera, it will be worth it to see the look on her face.
FFS I am not a 12 year old who doesn't know what one is! I don't even know the guy other than to nod hello in the corridor. Having laugh with your mates is one thing, but this guy lives for humiliating other people, it is generally why I avoid him. He really needs taking down a peg but I am stuck for ideas.
|
From:
Secret Santa moron, humiliation help required.
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=141659&f=141&h=0
That Towman gets around!
This message has been edited by bogush from IP address 81.77.96.145 on Dec 7, 2004 10:35 PM
|
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.82.168 | References: | December 5 2004, 5:41 PM |
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.82.168 | Perhaps I Misunderstood These: | December 5 2004, 5:46 PM |
|
ultimasimon
1514 posts
25 months |
10:28
I must say I have watched this thread from the beginning and what an interesting (and comical) debate it has been.
Diesel ed, I don't know what your profession is, but you are wasting your skills on here.
You should be working with Safespeed or similar. Your knife-like interpretation and reasoning would be both beneficial and welcomed, by the thousands of motorists who are facing ridiculous legal battles generated by the whole speed kills propaganda. |
|
|
|
|
V6GTO
1350 posts
9 months |
16:21
ultimasimon said:
|
I must say I have watched this thread from the beginning and what an interesting (and comical) debate it has been.
Diesel ed, I don't know what your profession is, but you are wasting your skills on here.
You should be working with Safespeed or similar. Your knife-like interpretation and reasoning would be both beneficial and welcomed, by the thousands of motorists who are facing ridiculous legal battles generated by the whole speed kills propaganda.
|
What he said!
|
From:
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?p=13&f=10&t=133917&h=0
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.82.168 | There Are Two Sides To Every Track: | December 5 2004, 6:27 PM |
|
IOLAIRE
683 posts
6 months |
Wednesday 10th November
George,
Bogush was a highly intelligent, but rather excitable individual who simply didn't know when to stop in a discussion, and tried to intimidate Ted one night after a bout of argumentative indulgence lasting about four days.
Ted, quite rightly, cut him off in his prime, because he just wouldn't stop.
Shame really, because he was very bright and spoke a lot of sense; but of course there are some people who find that difficult to handle.
|
|
Flat in Fifth
1066 posts
19 months |
Thursday 11th November
Bogush was/is someone who had to have the last word. He has been described elsewhere as a bully. Don't know about that myself.
He had/has a very distinctive style of discussion which it appears some people cannot handle. Yes at times it could be very frustrating, but I had a lot of time for old Bogush because at least his heart was/is in the right place, despite him getting rather intense at times.
Even when pushed with direct insults, of which "Bogbrush" is a very mild example, he would never resort to direct abuse, pertinent and sometimes impertinent questions yes.
It is not a clique thing. Nor having a down on anybody. Diesel ed your "style" of discussion at times is identical to that of bogush. Even some of your arguments are the exactly same, hence remember that post on another thread, where I claimed my £5?
Go on, come out of the closet, you know it will make sense in the long run. |
|
Flat in Fifth
1066 posts
19 months |
Thursday 11th November
gone said:
|
Flat in Fifth said:
|
Even when pushed with direct insults, of which "Bogbrush" is a very mild example, he would never resort to direct abuse, pertinent and sometimes impertinent questions yes. |
WHAT??? He/she very often started them and would try to belittle anyone who happened to disagree with any of his/her points of view. He/she was very good at direct abuse althoug I agree he/she never actually used expletives in the way he/she did it!
|
We might have a different view of what consists as abuse.
Simple name calling with no other constructive addition to the discussion is abuse in my opinion. Yes? No?
Dissecting another poster's comments using sarcasm amongst other ways. Not abuse in my book.
You allege direct abuse was made, fine I might have missed it speed reading those enormously long and tedious posts. Very willing to be shown that I am wrong.
|
|
IOLAIRE
683 posts
6 months |
Thursday 11th November
Flat in Fifth said:
|
gone said:
|
Flat in Fifth said:
|
Even when pushed with direct insults, of which "Bogbrush" is a very mild example, he would never resort to direct abuse, pertinent and sometimes impertinent questions yes. |
WHAT??? He/she very often started them and would try to belittle anyone who happened to disagree with any of his/her points of view. He/she was very good at direct abuse althoug I agree he/she never actually used expletives in the way he/she did it!
|
We might have a different view of what consists as abuse.
Simple name calling with no other constructive addition to the discussion is abuse in my opinion. Yes? No?
Dissecting another poster's comments using sarcasm amongst other ways. Not abuse in my book.
You allege direct abuse was made, fine I might have missed it speed reading those enormously long and tedious posts. Very willing to be shown that I am wrong.
|
You are absolutely spot on FiF!
Before I did anything this morning, I checked through this thread and there are no less than THIRTY SIX "responses" containing personal abuse and insults, most of it aimed at me.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm a big boy and I can guarantee the same individuals who assume the right to participate in digital bullying would not get away with it to my face.
Nevertheless, it is intensely irritating when it reaches these sort of levels, it achieves absolutely nothing in the way of constructive debate, takes up valuable bandwidth and only serves to create bad feeling.
You and I lock horns on here regularly FiF, but we do it with mutual respect and regard for each others opinion; that's the only way to enjoy debate and achieve anything.
How about a new rule Ted, no personal insults, it would make things a lot more enjoyable and creative? |
|
Flat in Fifth
1066 posts
19 months |
Thursday 11th November
IOLAIRE said:
|
You and I lock horns on here regularly FiF, but we do it with mutual respect and regard for each others opinion; that's the only way to enjoy debate and achieve anything.
How about a new rule Ted, no personal insults, it would make things a lot more enjoyable and creative?
|
I'll vote for Iolaire's last suggestion, and I'd be totally surprised if that is not in the rules which we all signed up to when registering. Think I had better go and take a look again - ho hum.
Funnily enough Iolaire we have indeed locked horns, but unless my memory is fading only on a couple of issues.
Namely the possible interpretations around the circumstances Iolaire Jnr's speeding case, and secondly just one facet of the Great Heck investigaton. If there have been more instances I do apologise for my delinquent brain cells.
Not that many when you consider the number of issues discussed.
"Not that many" refers to points of disagreement by the way, not the number of my remaining brain cells..... then again.
|
|
Pigeon
3037 posts
14 months |
Thursday 11th November
Flat in Fifth said:
|
Even when pushed with direct insults, of which "Bogbrush" is a very mild example... |
<pedant>It is to most of us, but not to Bogush himself - apparently "Bogush" means "gift of God" and therefore transmuting it to "Bogbrush" is blasphemous; he hated it, and I can respect that reaction.</pedant>
Flat in Fifth said:
|
It is not a clique thing. Nor having a down on anybody. Diesel ed your "style" of discussion at times is identical to that of bogush. Even some of your arguments are the exactly same, hence remember that post on another thread, where I claimed my £5?
Go on, come out of the closet, you know it will make sense in the long run. |
FWIW and since my name has been mentioned as a holder of such suspicions, I don't think you, Diesel Ed, are the same person as Bogush. It is however true that you have put forth identical arguments, such as attempting to apply road safety principles to the railways, which is why I called one of your posts "Bogushesque".
|
|
IOLAIRE
683 posts
6 months |
Thursday 11th November
diesel ed said:
|
Pigeon said:
|
you have put forth identical arguments, such as attempting to apply road safety principles to the railways, which is why I called one of your posts "Bogushesque". |
But why should the fact that more than one person applies basic safety principles to analagous transport systems, in fact to two types of "road" systems, strike anyone as worthy of comment? Surely everyone should be doing it?
|
George, the main reason I know you're not Bogush, and unfortunately no one else seems to see it, is that he had utterly no sense of humour.
Whereas you, at times you can be just as subtly mental as I. (that's a compliment by the way)
|
|
TheExcession
1360 posts
18 months |
Thursday 11th November
diesel ed said:
|
Lot's of stuff that is keeping my highly entertained |
ed - don't get bogged down and brushed under the carpet of the PH old time massive...
best
Ex
|
|
TheExcession
1360 posts
18 months |
Thursday 11th November
ed,
Seriously, don't get bogged down in all this.
I've been reading your posts and like IOLAIRE you have some very valid points.
Remember, it's far easier to attack a poster on an open forum like this than it is to get off your ass and confront those in charge of the way this country is being run.
Seems people are angry and pissed off, and in my mind rightly so.
The real problem is finding a way to channel all this energy in the right direction.
I have to admit that so far I have no answers to this problem...
best
Ex |
|
IOLAIRE
683 posts
6 months |
Friday 12th November
TheExcession said:
|
ed,
Seriously, don't get bogged down in all this.
I've been reading your posts and like IOLAIRE you have some very valid points.
Remember, it's far easier to attack a poster on an open forum like this than it is to get off your ass and confont those in charge of the way this country is being run.
Seems people are angry and pissed off, and in my mind rightly so.
The real problem is finding a way to channel all this energy in the right direction.
I have to admint that so far I have no answers to this problem...
best
Ex |
My advice as well George, that's why I made the point this morning about insults. I just totally ignore these sort of people now, it's not worth trying to get through to them. I genuinely believe that you could exhaust every intellectual fibre of your mind explaining something to them and all you'd get back would be a blank stare and an insult.
There are some highly interesting people on here, forget about the rest.
|
From:
The Railways
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.82.168 | An Interesting Counterpoint: | December 5 2004, 6:37 PM |
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.105.181 | See, It's Not Just Me: From An Thread Post | December 5 2004, 8:01 PM |
|
RichB
5285 posts
52 months |
Friday 1st October
Is there anything of interest here? I've scanned the posts but as usual it has degenerated into abuse. summary for me anyone? Rich... |
|
Flat in Fifth
1066 posts
19 months |
Friday 1st October
IOLAIRE said:
|
einion yrth said:
|
You know I think it altogether possible that IOLAIRE may possibly have forgotten the extreme sarcasm smiley. |
What! Moi??? Sarcastic???? NAAAAHHHH!!!!
|
Take a deep breath Iolaire, coun to to ten!
I might not agree with everything you say but would defend to the death your right to say it. That goes for Bogush too by the way. Certain things really are right on the money.
There are some very silly little boys on this site, who really need to grow up. Plenty others here and elsewhere who need to wake up and smell the coffee.
Off for a while so will not be able to reply to any constructive / puerile responses for some time.
|
|
cen
96 posts
3 months |
Friday 1st October
Iolaire, It as become evident from replies to your post that your intellect and knowledge gained from life’s experiences and study is frightening those with tunnel vision.
Maybe cognitive therapy would bring out the thought cells that may be lurking in the back of what once was called the brain for chosen individuals.
Your ideas are intrinsic to the thoughts of like minded people willing to adopt, adapt and improve the judicial farce that currently exists in our God forsaken Country.
Good luck with the website, I for one await its conception with eager anticipation |
|
|
deltaf
6806 posts
21 months |
Friday 1st October
cen said:
|
Iolaire, It as become evident ………………………
|
Same as him...what he said...
|
|
Flat in Fifth
1066 posts
19 months |
Saturday 2nd October
……….. Next it will be 4x4's and performance cars, then....... At the risk of being shouted at "slippery slope all the way......" |
From:
GENESIS
This message has been edited by bogush from IP address 84.65.29.19 on Dec 5, 2004 10:02 PM
|
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.29.19 | And The Other Viewpoint: | December 5 2004, 11:04 PM |
|
parrot of doom
218 posts
2 months |
22:19
Is anybody else fecking fed up of diesel ed and towman's little arguments?
Kindly OFF. |
|
|
regmolehusband
586 posts
25 months |
22:27
Not Towman but yes, I'm fed up with Diesel Ed - as a newomer (presumably) I don't think he quite understands yet that there are real people on the other end of his internet connection. He's far too aggressive and confrontational.
I suspect he's got a personality disorder.
>> Edited by regmolehusband on Sunday 5th December 22:41 |
|
|
hertsbiker
3531 posts
39 months |
22:54
regmolehusband said:
|
Not Towman but yes, I'm fed up with Diesel Ed - as a newomer (presumably) I don't think he quite understands yet that there are real people on the other end of his internet connection. He's far too aggressive and confrontational.
I suspect he's got a personality disorder.
>> Edited by regmolehusband on Sunday 5th December 22:41 |
|
|
|
|
towman
2714 posts
7 months |
05:31
parrot of doom said:
|
Is anybody else fecking fed up of diesel ed and towman's little arguments?
Kindly OFF. |
Apologies PoD. Arguments were limited to a couple of threads on SPL, but it appears I now have a stalker.
Steve
|
|
A couple?
And how many did he stalk me on?!
From:
LGVs banned from Lane 2
And what's Hertbiker’s problem?
|
hertsbiker
3543 posts
39 months |
Yesterday (23:48)
This is mean to be constructive thread, not a "knock the Bib" item. So please take it in the spirit it is meant, and not be abusive.
Why do I cheer when the criminals get away on TV "Police Chases". Why do I feel afraid of the Police. Why do I feel that they are never around when I want them, and never able to do anything when the going gets tough?
Whats wrong here? Aren't the Boys In Blue meant to be pillars of society? when did it go wrong, why don't we trust them? and more importantly - how can they regain the public trust?
|
From:
Serve the public trust?
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=141461&f=10&h=0
Because you wouldn’t listen to your Uncle Bogush.
And why does he have to have that PC intro?!
This message has been edited by bogush from IP address 81.76.5.141 on Dec 6, 2004 8:26 PM
This message has been edited by bogush from IP address 81.76.5.141 on Dec 6, 2004 7:55 PM
|
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.29.19 | Which Brings Us Full Circle To: | December 5 2004, 11:06 PM |
towman said:
|
Would you mind speaking in English please. I don`t understand fluent bollox.
What has the rubbish you have posted got to do with the fact that at 11pm there is a definate hazard from pedestrians who are the worse for wear.
Oh yes - no-one "deserves a funeral" for stepping into the road. The driver was going to fast. Is that too difficult a concept for you? Whatever you consider a reasonable speed, the posted limit was 30mph. End of argument. |
And -
towman said:
|
Sir, you really are one of the most offensive dweebs I have ever had the misfortune to "meet". Actually, you are the first and second most offensive....etc etc. But thats another story.
Are you sponsored by Euthenasia R Us? You are the best advert for the "assisting" of demented old fools that I can think of.
Go on then, start another load of bolox about "personal attacks" and "insults" etc. I really couldn`t give a sh*t. |
And -
towman said:
|
diesel ed said:
|
Run out of arguments then? Feel free to be as insulting as you like.Ok - You`re a wank*r Sticks and stones may "Brake" my bones, but words will never harm me. And personal attacks certainly won't undermine my argument. Ok - You`re STILL a wank*r......... |
|
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.29.19 | And Towman's Non Personality Disorder Idea Of Fun: | December 5 2004, 11:29 PM |
|
towman
2684 posts
7 months |
Wednesday
Sorry to say, I used to play this game when out shopping with Mrs T. I`d either get bored or start putting unhealthy, expensive stuff in our trolley, so she`d send me off to play.
After getting bored (again) with the usual........
Putting stuff in other peoples trolleys
Taking stuff out of other peoples trolleys
Moving other peoples trolleys
etc etc etc
I would go to the car park, scoping for the "front door haunters", wait until someone had seen me walking towards my car and then just as they pull up waiting for the vacant space, open the car, get my smokes out and stroll off. Hours of fun.
Steve |
From:
Supermarket parking towards Christmas.
|
towman
2714 posts
7 months |
Yesterday (14:57)
lunarscope said:
He`ll "have trouble eating his sweetcorn with no far king teeth".
Anyway, he`s gone. I managed to show he was Bogush. Let`s move on.
Steve
|
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahha
Bogush?
How?
From:
Blues Brothers Party
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=141594&f=141&h=0
This message has been edited by bogush from IP address 81.77.209.226 on Dec 7, 2004 12:28 AM
|
|
| bogusg
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.209.226 | Shock-Horror: Censorship On Pistonheads | December 7 2004, 1:23 AM |
And In The Pie & Piston virtual pub:
|
Dibble
1250 posts
8 months |
00:58
Byff said:
|
I'm sure I posted a daft comment regarding 1941 - surely it wasn't daft enough to be deleted?
Am I being censored? |
I asked Petrol Ted to delete it. He was kind enough to do so.
I didn't personally feel that your comment added anything AT ALL to this thread, and I didn't find it funny.
I'll gladly have a laugh on here with anyone, and don't mind people taking the mickey out of me, but I felt your comment was inappropriate, and frankly offensive.
|
From:
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=141471&f=141&h=0&p=2
"I NEVER get out of the way for Police cars..."
So how come Mr Towman gets away with what he gets away with on the supposedly serious Speed Plod & The Law?
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.96.145 | What Did Petrol Ted Do Before Pistonheads? | December 7 2004, 9:23 PM |
|
piccy mate
320 posts
5 months |
10:07
My first bad instance of policing was up in lancs back in 82 or 83 - An idiot had carved me up when he was joinig from the left - I showed my displeasure by beeping my horn. All hell let loose with the result we had a broken aerial and wing mirror. Eventually the numpties tired of trying to bait me out of the car and drove off.
I got the reg No and went a found a police man and reported it. I was invited to go down to the local nick which I willingly did.
When I got there I was told " we got the bloke , he's well known to us" - Good, I thought, Justice will be done - was it?
Was it hell, the PC immediately accused me of wilfully damaging scrote's car and threatened to charge me with criminal damage. a long argument ensued with no consideration of the facts presented by me or the 3 other occupants of the my car.
At that point we decided discretion was the better course and walked out.
I later discovered that this scrote was a police informer and that the police tended to overlook his indiscretions in return for his tales.
That made me realise the police were no longer my friend, but people to be very wary of.
Subsequent police actions (Inaction?) haven't lessened my wariness/dislike of them.
Piccy
|
From:
Serve the public trust?
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=141461&f=10&h=0
My emphasis.
So that's what Petrol Ted used to do!
So should I have:
"decided discretion was the better course and walked out" ?
Oh, I've just realised what he does now, and that I've been suckered:
Diesel Ed is the "Dark" Side of Petrol Ted!
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.96.145 | Cheek! | December 7 2004, 11:00 PM |
|
IOLAIRE
683 posts
6 months |
Thursday 11th November
diesel ed said:
|
Pigeon said:
|
you have put forth identical arguments, such as attempting to apply road safety principles to the railways, which is why I called one of your posts "Bogushesque". |
But why should the fact that more than one person applies basic safety principles to analagous transport systems, in fact to two types of "road" systems, strike anyone as worthy of comment? Surely everyone should be doing it?
|
George, the main reason I know you're not Bogush, and unfortunately no one else seems to see it, is that he had utterly no sense of humour.
Whereas you, at times you can be just as subtly mental as I. (that's a compliment by the way)
|
From:
The Railways
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?p=10&f=10&t=135189&h=0
|
Themoss
222 posts
6 months |
19:15
The man had a bloody TELESCOPIC BATON in his car! Do you know what that is?! It's a bloody extendable solid metal pole! Imagine you become involved in an unfortunate road-rage incident and someone pulls one of them out? I'd bring tears to your eyes, quite literally!!
Oh, i forgot, he'd 'hidden' it there to stop his daughter getting at it...
I'm glad they nicked him, bloody idiot. No doubt he'll walk free though. From his letter he sounds like a stuck-up chinless wonder double-barrelled pr**k, sorry, he does!!
|
From:
Knives and the Police ....
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=141570&f=10&h=0
Errrrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Maybe he worked on the buses?
As a conductor!
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.77.96.145 | OK, I Finally Understand The PH Massive: | December 8 2004, 12:12 AM |
See:
Funniest comic prank??
And:
Secret Santa moron, humiliation help required.
|
ace-T
1084 posts
23 months |
Monday
Need the PH collectives help to humiliate a complete p k who thinks it is funny to buy a vibrator in the work Secret Santa thing, for the single purpose of humiliating me in front of all my work collegues. I overheard him saying, bring a camera, it will be worth it to see the look on her face. 
FFS I am not a 12 year old who doesn't know what one is! I don't even know the guy other than to nod hello in the corridor.  Having laugh with your mates is one thing, but this guy lives for humiliating other people, it is generally why I avoid him. He really needs taking down a peg but I am stuck for ideas. So far I have got:
Gay porn subscription direct to his house.
Knickers sent to his girlfriend with a 'thanks for last night' note on them (bit shitty this one as his relationship is not that strong)
Extra small packet of condoms
Photoshopped pic of him being buggered by a rhinocerous.
Lonely hearts subscription in the Man to Man section.
I could just have a quiet word in his shell like and tell him if I do get what he is thinking of that I will report him for sexual harrassment though. They take that pretty seriously there. 
Any ideas?
Ace-T 
|
|
ace-T
1084 posts
23 months |
Monday
pvapour said:
|
Take it home and use it, sounds like you need it!
|
... and you are as funny as the tw@t from the office. Are you related?
All your replies are making me  thanks guys!
Ace-T
|
(There's a "w!nker" emoticon in there that you can't see!)
|
ace-T
1084 posts
23 months |
Monday
I see that anyone upseting a member of the PH 'family' is truly dicing with the devil! Wonderful suggestions, thank you all.  Particularly like the playstation one and the car in Auto Trader!
The other one I thought of was to wrap up a box in a wrapped box in a wrapped box and so on, until the last box is opened to find a receipt for all the wrapping paper and boxes. Not as nasty or rude as some but a self proclaimed 'practical joker' should appreciate it. By all accounts though he likes playing jokes but does not like to be played. Funny that.
Ace-T |
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?p=2&f=141&t=141659&h=0
Why am I not surprised that that's towman's mate?
So, basically, they appear to be two faced, schizophrenics with double "one rule for you-one rule for me/ do as we say-not as we do" standards!
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
81.76.79.20 | Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm | December 10 2004, 1:51 AM |
Ted Sed:
"The fact is he failed to integrate with this community despite having the same points of view and being offered much advice on how to fit in with fellow petrolheads."
So in:
Secret Santa moron, humiliation help required.
Is Ace-T being offered plenty of advice on how to fit in at work where she seems to be failing to integrate?
And they call me schizophrenic?!
PS What, exactly, was the "much advice on how to fit in with fellow petrolheads" ?
Don't reply to posts (especially insulting and abusive ones)?
Don't post?
"Go Away"?
Or perhaps he's refering to "don't respond to wind-ups"?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
And where, exactly, was the "much advice" to the wind-up merchants to "don't wind people up"?
And what about the wind-up merchants failing "to integrate with this community"?
And why, if I wind them up back, doesn't that count as integrating " with this community"?
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh:
I see:
It's only certain members of "this" community that are alowed to do that!
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.66.123.55 | Not A True Pistonhead Then?! | December 14 2004, 11:04 PM |
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.66.148.106 | Logic? Justice? Reason? | December 23 2004, 12:25 AM |
|
vixpy1
5377 posts
32 months |
Yesterday (00:50)
Basically, if you are bad, then you will be warned that your behavior is not appropriate, if you argue with the mods or do not change, you get Sin binned, where the mods will remonstrate with you, if you do not comply.. you get Banned. And it has been used!
|
|
Gazboy
10216 posts
19 months |
Yesterday (00:54)
I remember when Pwig was winding someone up, he was put in the bin, got let out, and said 'Cheers Teddy', so Ted slung him back in!
To be put in the bin, you have to irratate a few posters, wind people up maliciously (calling Mungo a socialy stunted hobbit would just be taken at face value, and he'd call me a max-power wannabe with a Van Der Graff haircut, and we'd all laugh), and just being a pain in the arse. |
My emphasis
Sin Bin
http://www.petrolheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=144857&f=141&h=0
Strange, I’ve never been in the Sin Bin.
Even Stranger, neither have Towman and the Ilk!
|
| bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.109.214 | Here's A Classic Pissed-Up Head Thread | December 26 2004, 2:51 PM |
Parking Ticket in Tesco?????
Guy in a rush in his lunch break to buy 10 boxes of mince pies for his work colleagues, can't find an ordinary parking space free, and parks in a Disabled Bay for about 10 minutes.
Comes back a mere 5 minutes later to find a parking ticket.
Asks a simple question:
"does anyone know if the fine is legally enforcable"
He accepts that he shouldn't have done it.
He admits that he's done wrong.
He has quite happily paid the fine.
And he's pointed this out several times and and that he's just curious about the legal situation.
And to date there are 90 replies over 5 pages almost exclusively telling him that:
He's done wrong.
He should happily paid the fine.
As well as load of insult and invective.
Did I ever mention the Pissed-On Heads Rules?
Or hypocricy?
| |
| | Current Topic - What Kind Of Justice, Logic, Reason Even Would You Expect From A PissedUp Head? | | Respond to this message |
| |
|
|