You are welcome as a guest, and as long as you do not abuse that hospitality, your views and comments will be respected.

............ [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ...... [Associaton of British Drivers] ...... [Transaction 2007 - Working for the UK Transport Industry] ............

   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.............

 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  

RAC: Rolled-over And Copped-out? Collaborated? Capitulated?

February 8 2005 at 9:25 PM
bogush  (Login bogush)
Forum Owner
from IP address 84.65.24.18

-
Over half of drivers admit speeding

Andrew Clark, transport correspondent
Monday February 7, 2005
The Guardian


More than half of motorists admit that they break the legal speed limit on Britain's roads most days, a new study shows.

The research by the RAC will today reveal that the number of drivers who say they speed regularly has risen by 10% over the past year to 55%, despite a sharp increase in the deployment of speed cameras.

The growth in casual speeding comes despite the Department for Transport's efforts to discourage it, with £14m spent last year on hard-hitting advertisements warning of the dangers of speeding, drink-driving and driver fatigue.

Top of the speeding league are drivers in the north, where 60% say they exceed the limit most days. Least likely to break the law are motorists in Scotland, at 51%, or in London, where 52% admit to speeding.

The RAC's spokesman, Philip Hale, said motoring organisations were increasingly worried about a phenomenon known as "driving under the radar" where motorists become wise to enforcement methods and use cunning to avoid detection.

"People are very wise to how speed cameras work - they slow down when they see a camera, then speed up when they get past it," he said. "Some drivers adopt a gladiatorial attitude towards beating Big Brother and beating the system."

The RAC wants more traffic police to complement the use of speed cameras. Forces have been criticised for cutting back on staff hours in favour of using technology for "remote" road policing.

Some 3,500 people died on the roads in 2003, an increase of 2%. But the government points out that the number of injuries has been falling steeply - total casualties amounted to 291,000, a drop of 10% on 2000.

Brake, the road safety charity, said today's findings could be a result of a greater awareness of speed limits which made more people own up to breaking the law.

A spokeswoman, Caroline Chisholm, said: "Previously, people were speeding but they didn't even consider it to be speeding. Now they've at least got a higher awareness that they're doing something very dangerous and they're breaking the law.

"The culture is slowly shifting - if you get caught by a camera, you don't get patted on the head with sympathy by people around you any more."

From:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1407239,00.html

 

My emphasis.

 


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.24.18

Britain's Speeding Epidemic

February 8 2005, 9:31 PM 

Monday 7 February 2005

Despite thousands of speed cameras on streets and motorways, Britain's in the grip of an epidemic of speeding.

That's the conclusion of the RAC Foundation, which publishes its annual report into the state of motoring in this country..............

............There are about 30m vehicles in the UK, which has one of the best road safety records in the world, says the RAC.

But about 100 people a day are seriously injured or killed on the roads and speed is blamed for a third of road deaths, it said.

Two thirds of drivers admitted speeding in 30mph zones, while 57% said they broke motorway speed limits.

The RAC's Philip Hale said: "We have something of a speeding epidemic on our hands. "Individual motorists know these risks, yet choose to ignore them."..........

From:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/breakfast/4242139.stm

 

So, spreading socialist illiberal spin then.

 


 
 
bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.24.18

Hmmmmmmmmm

February 8 2005, 9:41 PM 

'CURB THE SPEED FREAKS'

Harsher punishments for serious offenders............

[Who would be....?]

........The 2005 RAC Report on Motoring found that 57% of drivers break the motorway speed limit and almost two-thirds break 30mph speed limits - despite speed being the cause of one-third of all fatal accidents.

[Even the government has admitted that that is a load of b*ll*cks!!!!]

Overall, 42% of motorists said they would stop speeding if they thought they faced an immediate 12-month ban but only around 33% would respond if they faced a one-month ban.

RAC spokesman Philip Hale said: "More effective deterrents do need serious and urgent consideration."..............

From:

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13297244,00.html

 

My emphasis and [comments].

 

So that would be a longer than 12 month ban to be effective then?!?!?!?!

 

Rapid Automobile Curtailment?

Rigorous Automobile Constraint?

 


 
 
bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.24.18

Errrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmmm

February 8 2005, 9:47 PM 

Monday February 7, 11:48 AM
Roads suffer speeding epidemic

...............The RAC said current enforcement levels have little impact and the most common reason given for continued speeding is the slim chance of being caught.

Motorists told the RAC that the greatest deterrents would be a highly visible traffic police presence and draconian penalties including instant 12-month bans and in-car 'black-box' tracking systems to detect speeding offences.

Overall, 42% of motorists said they would stop speeding if they thought they faced an immediate 12-month ban, while 48% would change the way they drive if their car was fitted with an electronic tracking device, but only a third would respond if they faced a one-month ban.

RAC said the extreme measures highlighted by motorists were not practical, but recommended better detection, penalties and education to halt the trend.

It suggests graduated speeding penalties so worst offenders receive harshest punishments; mandatory driver re-training and education after a speeding ban; in-car, 'black-box' electronic tracking as part of penalties for repeat or serious offenders; and more investment in high visibility traffic policing.

From:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050207/344/fbwzl.html

 

Motorists told the RAC?!?!?!?

Motorists told the RAC?!?!?!?!?!?

 

Wot?!

Rang up and volunteered the information?!?!?!

Or did the RAC present them with a poorly prepared poll?

 


 
 
bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.24.18

Or Was It Actually Very Cleverly Crafted:

February 8 2005, 9:55 PM 

Motormouth                                      (Filed: 09/06/2001)

The Royal Automobile Club is still pro-motorist, isn't it? asks Mike Rutherford


Motormouth                                     (Filed: 25/05/2002)

The RAC Foundation has revealed how out of touch it is by backing further road charges, says Mike Rutherford

From:

http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=96157&messageid=1006869020

 

 

It Would Appear That Georgeda Is Working With Hackers And/Or Spooks:

http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=96157&messageid=1086301828

 


 
 
bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.24.18

Double Errrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmm

February 8 2005, 10:12 PM 

 

Dear Sirs

I was considering switching from the AA but I have just seen your report:

Claiming that speed is the cause of one-third of all fatal accidents. Even the government now admits to no more than speed might contribute to the severity of up to one third.

Claiming that more effective deterrents need serious and urgent consideration, including instant one year bans, mandatory driver re-training and education and in-car tracking systems.

Worse, you claim that motorists told the RAC this!

Told?

You mean that you badly (deliberately?) structured a survey to bring up these recommendations?!

Outrageous!

 

http://www.rac.co.uk/contactus/


 


 
 
bogush
(Login bogush)
Forum Owner
84.65.24.18

Rhe Report Is Actually From RAC The Rescue Co

February 8 2005, 10:20 PM 

As above.

Not the RAC Foundation,

But might as well stir up a hornets nest ! ; - )

 

Dear Sirs

I have just seen the RAC report:

Claiming that speed is the cause of one-third of all fatal accidents. Even the government now admits to no more than speed might contribute to the severity of up to one third.

Claiming that more effective deterrents need serious and urgent consideration, including instant one year bans, mandatory driver re-training and education and in-car 'black-box' tracking systems.

Worse, it claims that motorists told the RAC this!

Told?

You mean that a badly (deliberately?) structured a survey generated these results?!

Outrageous!

 

Sent via:

If you have any comments then please click here and complete the form

 


 
 
Current Topic - RAC: Rolled-over And Copped-out? Collaborated? Capitulated?  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2010 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
   

..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page ..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page.....The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Ecology Truth or Myth Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Resources Page..... The Its YOUR Duty! Motorists Protest News Page............................. !!gg* .......................... !! * .....................


Visitors are requested to keep their posts "legal, decent and honest" and comply with the normal rules of society and web netiquette. Visitors are fully responsible for their own posts and any consequences thereof. However, whilst accepting no responsibility for same, I reserve the right to remove any posts I happen to come across that I feel might be "dubious". The contents of any posts, or websites linked from any posts or any pages on this or related websites do not neccesarily reflect the views or opinions of the forum owner. All copyrights, trademarks, etc, acknowledged