re: Nasty weapons George Green - 131st post - 24 Aug 2005 20:55

Agnes McKenzie said:

>> "Good news that another man has been convicted for selling nasty weapons through a horrid web-site "guns2thugs"."

Tell us more Aggie?

What "nasty weapons"?

.

Or were they not only blank firing pistols:

But blank firing pistols that couldn't fire anything else as they would blow up in your hand if you tried.

And 12 gauge alarms for farmers.

.

Sounds more like the "horrid" guns2thugs wasn't selling weapons to thugs.

But to protection to people being subjected to anti-social behaviour.

.

Strange that there should have been a market for such things in this New Labour Utopia we live in!

.


re: Nasty weapons George Green - 132nd post - 24 Aug 2005 21:01

Agnes McKenzie said:

>> "I must also congratulate the police for blitzing Toton and stopping all this anti-social behaviour which no-one has had the guts to face up to before."

You will, of course, join me in utterly condeming the animal rights terrorists who have shut down the guinea pig farm through vandalism, arson, thuggery and bombing, then.

.

>> "I understand the local MP helped get both these sorted out."

What is he doing about the animal rights activists and their supporters and apologists.

I think we should be told.

Do let us know what this public spirited, citizen defending MP has done in this field, Aggie!

.

re: Nasty weapons George Green - 133rd post - 25 Aug 2005 11:35

Agnes or Ms McKenzie said:

>> "Bogush"

Are you George Painter?

He keeps on confusing me with Ol' bogey too.

Funny coincidence that.

Isn't it!

.

>> "You wrote:"

>> >> "You will, of course, join me in utterly condeming the animal rights terrorists who have shut down the guinea pig farm through vandalism, arson, thuggery and bombing, then."

>> "And of course I will."

I'm glad to hear it.

.

>> >> "What is he doing about the animal rights activists and their supporters and apologists."

>> "If you wish to know then perhaps you ought to ask him."

But you appear to be his spokesperson here.

So I'm asking you.

.

While you're on:

Do you also utterly condemn the supporters of and apologists for the animal rights activists.

re: Nasty weapons George Green - 134th post - 25 Aug 2005 12:03
Agnes or Ms McKenzie said:
>> "Bogush seemed to be under the misaprehension"

Sorry, Aggie baby, but it was me, George Green.

It would appear that you are the one under a misapprehension.

>> >> "that this man was selling: "blank firing pistols:"

>> >> "But blank firing pistols that couldn't fire anything else as they would blow up in your hand if you tried."

>> >> "And 12 gauge alarms for farmers"

>> "No he wasn't. He was selling nasty weapons capable of firing cs gas pellets"

cs gas?!

cs gas ?!

Isn't that the stuff the police are allowed to protect themselves with if they ever come accross a criminal.

But the public aren't if they are being mugged, assaulted, raped or even murdered?!

>> "and also capable of being converted to fire live ammunition."

You've been reading that wonderfull "campaigning" anti-gun Post again, haven't you Aggie?!

Of course you can convert them.

But, as I said, you'd be more than unwise to try to use them in the converted state.

Even the Beeb says:

"The prosecution did not proceed with more serious charges alleging that the pistols were capable of firing bullets."

Now, why would that be?

.

>> "I don't recall anyone on this board describing our society as a utopia..."

Hardly.

After half a century of wishy-washy, bleedin'-heart, woolly-liberal, trendy-lefty, guardian-reading social engineering.

>> "that is apart from you Mr Mann. Is that what you believe? If so I regret to say that you are living under an illusion."

Have you been smoking the same kind of stuff that gets smoked at ministerial and prime ministerial dinner parties?

.

How could I think it's a Utopia when so called social workers and teachers have turned out generations of kids who roam the streets killing with impunity.

But what will happen to this guy?!

According to the Post:

"The CPS has recommended that each charge carry a ten-year sentence."

And it's a minimum of five!

.

By the way, did you know that Sigmund Freud believed that a fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.

I wonder what a fear of cars is a sign of?

.

re: Warning George Green - 135th post - 25 Aug 2005 18:46

George Painter said:

>> "Bogush is up to his old tricks again."

Actually, it looks like George (Painter, that is) is up to his old tricks:

>> "He's taking chunks of other people's postings from this forum and pasting them on his own board."

Actually, that would be me, George (George P, that is).

Me, as in George G (for Green, but not in any environMentalist, nor naive, sense).

.

>> "I seem to remember we had this issue with him before and the moderators cleared up the legal position."

Actually, as I seem to recall from my reading of the archives, the moderators never commented on the issue.

Or do you mean directly to you (in the pub? At work, perhaps?)?

>> "We all had to put on each post: This remains the copyright of XXXX and the BBC and may not be reproduced in whole or part without permission from XXXX or the BBC"

>> "A nuisance I know."

Especially as that came from someone who didn't have a clue, and was totally and completely, incorrect.

However, someone who had actually taken the trouble to check the facts before posting clarified that you couldn't copyright posts on a forum.

And that anyone following the advice you are giving (again?) would be wasting their time.

.

>> "Agnes - you may be interested to know he's started a thread entitled "nasty Aggie".

>> "I'd be interested to hear the moderators views."

Wot?

On people posting nasty posts?

Probably libelously?

About guns?

.

>> "This remains the copyright of George Painter and the BBC and may not be reproduced in whole or part without permission from George Painter or the BBC."

No, it doesn't George.

Coming from someone who keeps (in a most unfriendly and argumentative way) posting threats about seeing his solicitor:

You seem to be woefully ill-advised on matters legal.

I'd get a new solicitor if I were you.

George.

.

not © of XXXX because it can't be © !

re: Warning George Green - 136th post - 25 Aug 2005 18:55

rugby-crazy said:

>> "I think we have to feel sorry for him, obviously needs to get out more. Must spends hours cutting and pasting to pad out a very boring site."

Not a very friendly post, is it?

In fact, quite insulting.

Is that the most sophisticated contribution you could come up with then?

Hardly surprising if you think that cutting and pasting a few (of my ) posts must take hours and means that I need to get out more.

Sorry to disappoint you, but I actually spend most of my time out and about.

But then, I can think on my feet.

And type with all ten of my fingers and thumbs.

Hard to believe, I know:

But not everyone who has an internet presence lacks a life in the real world.

Think of it as my sacrificing a tiny part of my life for the benefit of my family, friends and the world at large.

What a sad site.

Surely you Brits have got something better to do. Or is it so lousy in Nottingham that all you can do is sit by your computer all day long?

Hi Teddy.

Are you sure you aren't Edward G Robinson?

On another scam?

 

Anyway.

So how sad must the whole of the USA be?

If you've got to come all the way over here.

And post on our forums.

For your fun!

 

You are over here, aren't you Teddy?

Posting from the same IP address as Prof Relaxed.

Georgedagnes McKenzie.

And "all" their "friends".

 

re: Warning George Green - 137th post - 27 Aug 2005 19:40
rugby-crazy said:
>> "They may be your posts George/Bogush or whoever you are but you are using other peoples words, albeit in quotation marks on a website discussion that they did not directly contribute to or even perhaps want to. Hardly cricket old chap is it?"

Feel free to explain what all that means sometime.

In the meantime, in case you hadn't spotted it.

You might like to know that the posts were made here.

In response to the quoted posts.

In a discussion with the quoted person(s).

And archived there as they seemed to keep disappearing from here for some strange reason.

Hope that helps.

.

Now, why not run along and start a cricket thread, eh, old chap?

.

re: Warning George Green - 138th post - 27 Aug 2005 19:46
rugby-crazy said:
>> "I think we have to feel sorry for him, obviously needs to get out more. Must spends hours cutting and pasting to pad out a very boring site."

.

You're not related to Edward G Roosvelt who posted this on Ol' bogey's sight:

>> "What a sad site."

>> "Surely you Brits have got something better to do. Or is it so lousy in Nottingham that all you can do is sit by your computer all day long?"

Apparently from the same IP Address as "Prof Relaxed",

"Georgedagnes McKenzie"

"And "all" their "friends"."

According to Ol' bogey.

.

Are you?

.

re: Warning George Green - 139th post - 27 Aug 2005 20:04
George Painter said:
>> "Then you must be a very Green Environmentalist Bogush."

You really need tosee an optician, George!.

>> "I don't think there's a single person on this board or probably anywhere else that you haven't rubbed up the wrong way and they've come to despise your views."

Well, that could well be true of the environMentalists, George.

I wonder why that is?

>> "Even people who came in agreement with you, leave as opponents."

Wot?

You don't mean people like:

- Edward G Roosvelt

- Georgedagnes McKenzie

And

- Edward G Roosvelt

Do you?

.

>> "Keep up the good work! - You're our best recruiting sergeant!"

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

"Clever" "response" #1 from the Activists Handbook.

Keep up the good work George!

.

This site very boring. In China we have name for boring sites.....Gobble di gook!

You should try reading some of robert's rot over on the BBC site.



Like the post this is in response to:


re: Warning George Green - 162nd post - 6 Sep 2005 19:46
robert l said:
>> "Bogush."

Yawwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnn.

Your inability to rid yourself of your demons is getting tedious.

.

>> "I'm still waiting for a simple yes or no on the question:

>> "Do you think car exhaust fumes are dangerous?"

>> "Yes or no"

Hardly surprising, as there isn't a simple yes or no answer.

But, just for you, I will give you a simple yes or no answer if, and when, you give me a simple yes or no answer to the questions I will ask at the end of this post.

.

>> "I don't want the rubbish you gave when you tried to avoid answering last time."

When have I ever tried to avoid giving you an answer, robert?

I'm waiting!

.

>> "Yes or no"

>> "What part of yes or no don't you understand?"

I understand every part of it.

Unlike, it would appear, yourself.

Which is surprising (and disappointing).

As I seem to recall you having this same conversation with your ol' mate bogey.

Who seemed to go to a great deal of time, trouble and effort trying to help you understand.

All to no avail, it would seem.

That man must have the patience of a saint!

.

Now then, here are my questions.

Every one of which you must answer with a simple yes or no to justify your demand, command, even, that I answer your question with a simple yes or no:

1) Do you think it is dangerous for someone with a deep seated brain tumour to have it surgically removed?

I'm waiting for a simple yes or no on the question.

2) If speed is dangerous would you agree that the slower you cycle the safer you are?

I'm waiting for a simple yes or no on the question.

3) If speed kills would you agree that the slower a plane flies the safer it is or do you think that it is safer for it to go faster?

I'm waiting for a simple yes or no on the question.

4) Some people say that if it saves just one life it's worth it and that one ton cars should travel at 20mph where there is a chance of a collision with a child so do you agree that trains should travel at 5mph wherever there is a chance of them hitting a child because they are so much heavier and harder and take so much longer to slow down.

I'm waiting for a simple yes or no on the question.

And, of course, the classic:

5) Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

I'm waiting for a simple yes or no on the question.

.

From:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-perl/h2/h2.cgi?thread=%3Cmod.1124967978-11340.8%40forum1.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&find=%3Cmod.1124967978-11340.8%40forum1.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&board=england.nottingham&sort=Te



Nasty robert!

re: Warning robert l - 1234th post - 6 Sep 2005 20:42
Bogush your answers.
Question 1..........yes......they could live longer without surgery.

Question 2..........yes.......I have experienced accidents on a bicycle, at slow speeds and at faster speeds. Luckily I live to tell the tale.

Question 3..........no.......As i am aware a plane must fly at a certain speed or it would stall. The skies are controlled better than roads.

Question 4..........no.......Trains do not travel where there are many children.

Question 5..........yes.......I'm not married. I deny any accusations.

There you are. Yes or No answers!!

Now where is your yes or no to just one question I have put to you?

It's easy, yes or no one or the other.

re: Warning George Green - 164th post - 6 Sep 2005 21:06
robert wrote:
>> Bogush your answers.

Which part of George Green don't you understand?

.

There you are. Yes or No answers!!

Errrrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmm#

Sorry, but none of those were yes or no answers.

They were all qualified with a sentence.

You made the rules.

But even when it comes to things that you have written, you seem to struggle with understanding.

Let me remind of of your rules:

>> >> I'm still waiting for a simple yes or no on the questions:

>> >> Yes or no

>> >> I don't want the rubbish you gave when you tried to avoid answering last time.

>> >> Yes or no

>> >> What part of yes or no don't you understand?

>> >> Clutching at straws, what?

>> Now where is your yes or no to just one question I have put to you?

>> It's easy, yes or no one or the other.

Not a sentence.

The Thoughts Of Chairman robert George Green - 165th post - 6 Sep 2005 21:24
.
Q1) Do you think it is dangerous for someone with a deep seated brain tumour to have it surgically removed?

A1) yes

So we should stop all surgical removal of deep seated tumours regardless of the judgment of the people actually in the driving seat.

.

Q2) If speed is dangerous would you agree that the slower you cycle the safer you are?

A2) yes

robert thinks that you won't wobble and then fall off if you cycle slower and slower.

.

Q3) If speed kills would you agree that the slower a plane flies the safer it is or do you think that it is safer for it to go faster?

A3) no

Huh?

.

Q4) Some people say that if it saves just one life it's worth it and that one ton cars should travel at 20mph where there is a chance of a collision with a child so do you agree that trains should travel at 5mph wherever there is a chance of them hitting a child because they are so much heavier and harder and take so much longer to slow down.

A4) no

robert seems to think it's OK for trains to hurtle through stations, over level crossings and through towns and cities where children often play on the tracks.

He doesn't seem to care how many kids get killed as long as the rail road companies can make loadsa profit.

.

Q5) Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

A5) yes

robert used to beat his wife!

.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-perl/h2/h2.cgi?thread=%3C1126038247-25028.17%40forum1.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&find=%3C1126038247-25028.17%40forum1.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&board=england.nottingham&sort=Te

re: Warning George Green - 166th post - 6 Sep 2005 21:30

robert l wrote:

>> Bogush.

Dear oh dear oh dear............

.

>> If you stopped the bull$..t (George Green) and cut out the acid remarks I might listen to what you have to say. But if you insist in treating everybody on this message board as you do, then expect the same in return.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

You post "bull$..t" because you think that I post "bull$..t"

Interesting.

Let me make it easy for you.

If you actually bothered to read my posts you would have spotted that I have already answered your silly little question ages ago.

.

re: The Thoughts Of Chairman robert George Green - 167th post - 6 Sep 2005 21:43
robert l wrote:
>> Lol Bogush.

What's your favourite perfume?

Obsession?

.

>> You are putting words in my mouth. Every body will spot that a mile away.

They are your yes or no answers, aren't they, robert?

Are you denying that they are your yes or no answers?

Yes or no?

It's a simple question robert.

Are they your yes or no answers?

>> >> Yes or no

>> >> I don't want the rubbish you gave when you tried to avoid answering last time.

>> >> Yes or no

>> >> What part of yes or no don't you understand?

>> >> Clutching at straws, what?

. .

>> Sometimes you are really naive.

And are not my comments the logical interpretations (where a logical interpretation is possible) of your yes or no answers?

Yes or no robert.

I want a yes or no answer.

Which part of yes or no do you not understand?

.

>> But if you want to play games

Which games are these then robert?

The yes or no game perhaps?

.

>> you will not win any friends. You don't have many here anyway.

You know what they say robert:

You always hurt the one you love.

And the truth hurts.

.

I love you robert

But it's what they call tough love!

.

re: The Thoughts Of Chairman robert George Green - 168th post - 6 Sep 2005 21:48
robert l said:
>> Bogush.

Doh!

.

>> You are now stooping really low.

>> Accusing me of beating my wife is slander.

>> Be careful what you write if you have no proof.

.

But where have I accused you of anything robert?

I merely copied what you wrote.

Remember?

(No wonder you can't remember any of what I tell you!)

.

I said: remember?

Question: Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

robert's Answer: yes

I rest my case, M'lud!

.