Arthur Gibson (no login) from IP address 203.100.240.247
When Australia’s birth rate fell to an all time low of 14% last year, the government allowed a local drug company to market a “Viagra for women” without prescription in pharmacists’ shops. The drug has a slow release formulation that acts on the woman’s body for up to five years and there is no known antidote, once the medication has been swallowed.
The effect of the drug is to significantly increase a lady’s libido, with some delighted Australian males reporting that partners who previously had no interest in, or had permanently banned martial relations, now wanted it up to five times a night. A side effect of the product is that the patient’s cup size increases by approximately three sizes, but Australian males have not complained about this change to their partner’s anatomy and refer to the drug as “The Bra Buster”. Women who refuse their medictaion can be given alcoholic drinks laced with the appropriate does of the drug.
Australian birth rates have since risen from 14% to 98.3% and are still rising. The opposition spokesman for women’s rights has strongly condemned the move and claims that the government policy has been bungled. She quotes World Health Organisation figures that project that Australia’s population will be greater than that of India within fifteen years. However with polls showing a 94% lead for the ruling party, most opposition MPs support the government policy.
TV stations are running government sponsored advertisements showing the effect of the new drug and a link to one such TV commercial is given below. I found it to be quite revealing.
Why do you have to call people names like you do? What do you think it achieves?
Anonymous (no login) 62.254.0.48
Re: "Viagra for women"
September 24 2005, 6:51 PM
see http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=96157&messageid=1127556220&lp=1127556220
Anonymous (no login) 213.104.241.138
Re: "Viagra for women"
September 24 2005, 7:00 PM
AH I see.
Wehn I first visited here about a week ago I was misled by the phrase "comply with the normal rules of society". In the sort of society that I live in people do not offer gratuitous insults to others when all they have done is try to talk.
Perhaps Bogush lives in a different sort of society to me - but it does not seem to comply with "normal" rules.
AH I see. Wehn I first visited here about a week ago I was misled by the phrase "comply with the normal rules of society".
What it says is:
Visitors are requested to keep their posts "legal, decent and honest" and comply with the normal rules of society and web netiquette.
ie no spam, no trolling, treat your host and his other guests with respect.
Read the posts and lurk a while until you get the hang of how the forum works.
No Bulshit
Like:
In the sort of society that I live in people do not offer gratuitous insults to others when all they have done is try to talk.
No, all you've done is bullshit, troll, spam, and offer gratuitous insults.
So it's true that:
Perhaps Bogush lives in a different sort of society to me
But not that:
- but it does not seem to comply with "normal" rules.
Anonymous (no login) 213.104.241.138
Re: "Viagra for women"
September 24 2005, 11:24 PM
I see that you have to respo0nd with aggression and wantopn rudeness.
"Visitors are requested to keep their posts "legal, decent and honest" and comply with the normal rules of society and web netiquette."
Which I have
"ie no spam" None from me "no trolling" none from me "treat your host and his other guests with respect." I have, unfortunately our host has seen fit to treat me with rudeness and contempt from the start
"No Bulshit"
In the eye of the beholder
"In the sort of society that I live in people do not offer gratuitous insults to others when all they have done is try to talk."
This is true for most of us. Is it not for you?
"No, all you've done is bullshit, troll, spam, and offer gratuitous insults."
No I haven't, as you well know. This is a simple lie.
"So it's true that: Perhaps Bogush lives in a different sort of society to me"
As you say
"but it does not seem to comply with "normal" rules."
Sorry, but you have responded with rudeness and aggression from the start with no good reason. It looks like you call people names, demonise and insult anyone it seems who does not immediately agree with you. You have acted with unwarranted rudeness towards me from the start and haven't even the good grace to apologise. What is your purpose here? I cannot see what you are trying to achieve with this sort of behaviour.
Really Bogush, if you acted the way you do here face to face with people you would find yourself without friends. I know it is easy to be brave on an internet forum, but all you do is come across as a bad tempered bully.
A bit of self depracating humour regarding the fact that I'd not realised that posting what I'd previewed would have made all the ">" and "<" disappear.
Do you even know what I'm talking about?
No?
Well, there's a surprise!
Anonymous (no login) 62.254.0.48
Re: "Viagra for women"
November 3 2005, 5:24 PM
I didn't realise it was a full moon last night.
Talking to yourself at 12:55?
Peter Taylor (no login) 62.254.0.48
Re: "Viagra for women"
November 3 2005, 5:56 PM
Yes he does have a habit of judging other peoples responses before either giving them the chance to reply or bothering to read their offerings.
Visitors are requested to keep their posts "legal, decent and honest" and comply with the normal rules of society and web netiquette.
Visitors are fully responsible for their own posts and any consequences thereof.
However, whilst accepting no responsibility for same, I reserve the right to remove any posts I happen to come across that I feel might be "dubious".
The contents of any posts, or websites linked from any posts or any pages on this or related websites do not neccesarily reflect the views or opinions of the forum owner.
All copyrights, trademarks, etc, acknowledged