Sorry, exactly which post was childish and insulting?
"The House of Lords was an unelected chamber based on heredity or patronage - scarcely the last bastion of democracy."
So no change there then!
Except that it is now powerless to oppose a parliamentary dictatorship, whereas the "undemocratic" predecessor could.
"The 1st past the post system has generally produced governments elected by a minority of the voters"
There's a difference between having the support of a large minority of the electorate, fighting to defend yourself against a large minority of parliament, and having the press snapping at your heels, and a second chamber with teeth.
And having the support of a small majority of the electorate, being able to walk all over the "opposition" with the approval and help of a lap-dog meeja, with a totally ineffective second chamber.
- I agree it needs changing, but so, still, does the House of Lords.
You can say that again.
But what chance of that now?