Return to Index  

Re: Safeguard-ness

December 6 2003 at 7:07 AM
psiberpunk 


Response to Safeguard-ness

 

I hate to disagree but Dhomo and Sanakan never, not once, did anything that was clearly against Safeguard wishes (with the exception of when Sanakan was transferred to the GA, of course.)

I suppose a more accurate denomination for Killy would be "rogue Safeguard". I still don't get why they would give him a new suit, and later when he's searching for Cibo a whole lot of Safeguards try to kill him. Not to mention the last one he encounters that practically looks like a bald version of himself. I guess the Safeguard are just incredibly inconsistent in their reasoning, or maybe there are conflicting internal factions within them.

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Re: Re: Safeguard-ness - Kinomoto on Dec 6, 6:13 PM
    1. Re: Re: Re: Safeguard-ness - psiberpunk on Dec 6, 7:05 PM
      1. Re: Re: Re: Re: Safeguard-ness - Jenshin on Dec 7, 3:19 AM
      2. Re: Re: Re: Re: Safeguard-ness - Kinomoto on Dec 7, 4:54 PM
        1. What I think it means by cyborg... - Jenshin on Dec 7, 9:56 PM
     
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement