--


I feel pretty

by ueasly

 
..but you don't want to know bout that. You want to know my thoughts about the Shat. This guy is amazing - why is he amazing - becuase, unlike the Hoff, he hasn't become limited by the name. He could've let himself be confined. He could've let the name destroy him from within. You see it happen all the time. The name is what you are, you are the name - therefore you must be the name. The name defines *you*, and you not the name! But the Shat is so many things - Kirk, TJ, Manny, and each time the Shat is something new. In the end, the Shat will always escape!

Anyway, now that's out of my system. (I took a brisk jog btw) - if there's 1 thing we can learn from SW it's that f you want to destroy something mighty you destroy it from within. Same message in Rambo3 in fact. And I don't think trek has worked out that it's only fucking itself here - what was the biggest threat to trek superdominance in the last 20 years?? Babylon 5. Then we got Voyager and it still got 7 seasons. Surely some1 at trek central - just 1 of these pencil-pushing beurocrats... buerau... it's beuero then.. fuck, 5 minutes in Word and the bastard can't even tell me how to spell beaurocrats... (ahh.. free-flowing intuition:).
So moving on, change is all good. Fishborne cannot possibly save that movie. And apparently bamboo shirts are going to be the next big thing.
Most importantly we can only destroy ourselves. Or something else can destroy us when they pretend to be us (but then do they lose a little something of theirselves?) - but they can't destroy us if they don't know what it is exactly they're trying to destroy? I mean what is trek exactly? No, don't answer that! Instead, tell me what is trek... sorta. What is it... about. How does it... affect you. Otherwise it's a series of things that does a particular job, and you mightaswell write it as a frickin formular you beuraucrat!

You need a more persuassive demonstration? I could destroy each of you....

I could get inside you and destroy you from within, but being you and destroying myself.

Erik I would use ideas. Pernitious liberal-fascist idea. Or something.

Benno I would use names. Call myself Bendno or somthing - Benano. Should've given this more thought really..

Oh and Planet Riker?



Posted on Sep 4, 2006, 5:36 PM
from IP address 195.92.67.66

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. The first site on the net to discuss the next Battleship Galactica movie!. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 4, 2006
    1. Welcome to Battleship Galactica!. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 6, 2006
      1. Battleship Galactica: the obvious choices. , Sep 6, 2006
        1. More action flicks. Battleship Galactica type guy, Sep 6, 2006
        2. Battleship Galactica ad Battleship Galactica movies. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 6, 2006
          1. Battleship Galactica. , Sep 6, 2006
            1. I think I know what your saying.. Erik, Sep 7, 2006
              1. You can take this stuff in so many ways.. Erik, Sep 7, 2006
                1. You're wrong Erik. Benno, Sep 18, 2006
          2. Think inside the Box then.. Erik, Sep 7, 2006
    2. Info. Anonymous, Sep 7, 2006
      1. Deanna die?. , Sep 7, 2006
        1. bad idea. jiggy, Sep 7, 2006
          1. I totally agree.... , Sep 7, 2006
            1. I can. Klingon_honour, Sep 7, 2006
          2. They should kill all the characters.. Erik, Sep 8, 2006
        2. change or get rid of her. starboy, Sep 7, 2006
          1. Just wait and see.... , Sep 7, 2006
      2. Deanna dying?. Anonymous, Sep 7, 2006
        1. You go, girl!. , Sep 7, 2006
          1. I not undastand. George, Sep 7, 2006
            1. ok. mike, Sep 7, 2006
      3. What is the Andromeda Galaxy subject?. Landru, Sep 7, 2006
        1. hey Queasly (forum owner)... user, Sep 7, 2006
          1. Maybe. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 7, 2006
    3. How about this for Battleship Galactica!. , Sep 7, 2006
      1. About Lore.... Anonymous, Sep 7, 2006
        1. lore?. Fabio, Sep 7, 2006
          1. Yes, what did happen to all those enemies?. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 7, 2006
      2. why not?. Helmling, Sep 7, 2006
        1. Well, Kahn was pretty shallow!. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 7, 2006
          1. damn.. , Sep 7, 2006
            1. Hmmm........ Erik, Sep 8, 2006
              1. Does this seem oddly familar?. Queasly forum owner), Sep 8, 2006
                1. someone help me. Benno, Sep 18, 2006
    4. Battleship Galactica Idea. , Sep 7, 2006
      1. hey?. fabio, Sep 7, 2006
        1. i mean. fabio, Sep 7, 2006
      2. That's a great idea. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 7, 2006
    5. Wow, so many visitors!. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 12, 2006
      1. bump. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 12, 2006
        1. You know what you could do?. Trevor Skuzbucket, Sep 13, 2006
          1. Did I ask you?. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 13, 2006
            1. Little harsh?. noesisy, Sep 13, 2006
              1. You're right. Queasly (forum owner), Sep 13, 2006
  2. The Beuro. Erik, Sep 5, 2006
    1. A friend in need is a friend in deed.. Erik, Sep 5, 2006

Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement