|
1. The MHRA and their sub-committees are public money very well spent as the Agency work extremely hard to safeguard the health of the public.
|
|
13.18 % (34)
|
|
2. The MHRA gives an average overall performance compared to a typical gov run department and could do better.
|
|
1.94 % (5)
|
|
3. The MHRA are very poor at resolving issues of safety in drugs and badly need to improve their working attitude and overall performance.
|
|
1.16 % (3)
|
|
4. The MHRA put the pharmaceutical and their own personal interests before the safety of the public and their motives and methodology should be investigated by a totally independent body.
|
|
12.02 % (31)
|
|
5. The MHRA are corrupt, deceiptful and without ethics on certain drug issues where there is evidence of harm to the public and should therefore be under criminal investigation.
|
|
71.71 % (185)
|
|
Total votes: 258
|